Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wardaddy
I believe that self-defense is the ultimate right of every human being. If Junta was attacked and felt his safety was threatened, his actions were justified even though he killed the coach. I feel the justice system sides with the attacker too often in self defense cases. You lay one punch on me, I will fight till you can't do it again.
4 posted on 01/11/2002 8:53:58 AM PST by toupsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: toupsie
I've never started a fight in my life but being big for my age when I was a kid I had to fight older guys all the time. You are correct. A fight is over when the other guy is outta gas. Fights really get dangerous when one is one the ground and overpowered...it's easy to choke someone out indefinitely. Always something I avoided if at all possible. I can understand how in the heat of a fight ...it is very easy not to know when enough is enough. This is not to say the accused doesn't deserve some punishment.
11 posted on 01/11/2002 9:03:26 AM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: toupsie
I believe that self-defense is the ultimate right of every human being.

Defense of ones self or of ones family is more than a right, it is an obligation and a duty owed to the gift of life.

"There exists a law, not written down anywhere, but inborn in our hearts; a law which comes to us not by training or custom or reading but by derivation and absorption and adoption from nature itself; a law which has come to us not from theory but from practice, not by instruction but by natural intuition. I refer to the law which lays it down that, if our lives are endangered by plots or violence or armed robbers or enemies, any and every method of protecting ourselves is morally right. When weapons reduce them to silence, the laws no longer expect one to await their pronouncements. For people who decide to wait for these will have to wait for justice, too, and meanwhile they must suffer injustice first. Indeed, even the wisdom of the law itself, by a sort of tacit implication, permits self-defence, because it does not actually forbid men to kill; what it does, instead, is to forbid thebearing of a weapon with the intention to kill. When, therefore, an inquiry passes beyond the mere question of the weapon and starts to consider the motive, a man who has used arms in self-defence is not regarded as haveing carried them with a homicidal aim."

"Civilized people are taught by logic, barbarians by necessity, communities by tradition; and the lesson is inculcated even in wild beasts by nature itself. They learn that they have to defend their own bodies and persons and lives from violence of any and every kind by all the means within their power."..................................Marcus Tullius Cicero, during the final years of the Roman Republic

91 posted on 01/12/2002 6:59:27 AM PST by eloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson