Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attorney General Ashcroft and Chief of Staff Recused Themselves In All Enron Matters
Department of Justice ^

Posted on 01/10/2002 10:42:36 AM PST by RCW2001

Department of Justice Seal Department of Justice


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
THURSDAY, JANUARY 10, 2002
WWW.USDOJ.GOV
AG
(202) 514-2008
TDD (202) 514-1888

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE STATEMENT

After review of the relevant facts and law, the Attorney General and his Chief of Staff, Mr. David Ayres, have recused themselves in all matters arising out of allegations of misconduct by Enron Corporation due to the totality of the circumstances of the relationship between Enron and the Attorney General. The Attorney General has not been involved in any aspect of initiating or conducting any investigation involving Enron. Any and all responsibilities that would be exercised by the Attorney General with regard to any such matters will be handled by the Deputy Attorney General.

###

02-009


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: MurryMom
FYI: From the Houston Chronicle (Enron defends timing of checks for Democrats )

WASHINGTON -- Just days before Enron Corp. landed in bankruptcy court, the one-time political powerhouse may still have been funneling campaign dollars to Democratic lawmakers, federal election records indicate.

As Enron executives were scrambling to salvage a deal with Houston-based Dynegy in a vain effort to stave off bankruptcy, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee received three checks from the Houston-based energy and trading giant totaling $100,000, Federal Election Commission records show.

The contributions were collected on Nov. 26, according to the committee's report to the FEC, six days before Enron sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Hmmmm?????

101 posted on 01/10/2002 1:15:20 PM PST by American72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: AlGone2001
What is your point. Debate the issue. What difference does it make when someone registered here?

If they have somthing to say, I want to hear it.

102 posted on 01/10/2002 1:34:10 PM PST by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Isn't it typical that the LIBERAL MEDIA is making such a big deal about this, which is obviously nothing, and yet they IGNORED the treason committed on a daily basis by the Clintons?? --Alyssa
103 posted on 01/10/2002 1:42:58 PM PST by alyssa_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Right away, Ashcroft shows more class than Stooge Reno ever had.
104 posted on 01/10/2002 1:48:09 PM PST by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
It was a cancer that grew in the Clinton Presidency...

Enron's Dirty Laundry

The Dems really don't want to go there....read it and weep. The weak links they are trying to establish to Bush and Ashcroft ain't nothing compared to what will be uncovered about Clinton and his cronies...including Ron Brown.

105 posted on 01/10/2002 2:09:21 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Holden Magroin
How could he know what HE DIDN'T KNOW???
106 posted on 01/10/2002 2:15:43 PM PST by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
Or what.
107 posted on 01/10/2002 2:21:17 PM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dane; LenS
Ashcroft has something Janet Reno never had, class. Janet Reno was the stonewaller in chief.

I can't think of a single time Janet Reno ever recused herself from anything. Am I missing something here?

108 posted on 01/10/2002 2:23:38 PM PST by butter pecan fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Can anyone tell me why
"Enron is not Bush's Whitewater: Commentary It Will Be Worse" keeps getting deleted?

http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7B903B88E7%2D7C09%2D4FC6%2DB706%2D49697A5B66F1%7D&

109 posted on 01/10/2002 2:46:46 PM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #110 Removed by Moderator

To: Dianna
Who would be the watchdog group supposed to make sure that businesses are complying with financial law?

I believe that would be the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

The law that required independently audited financial statements from public companies was in response to the stock market crash in 1932. "Cooking the books" by many publicly traded companies was a contributing factor to the crash.

111 posted on 01/10/2002 2:56:22 PM PST by Strider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
An Article only Search for -- Enron --- will get you to them.

Thanks. I'll have to take a look.

112 posted on 01/10/2002 2:59:16 PM PST by Strider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
Please do tell us what exactly the administration did in return for campaign cash.

Enron Reps Met 6 Times with Cheney or His Staff

Do you think non-contributors got that kind of access?

113 posted on 01/10/2002 3:03:21 PM PST by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
Is Enron a cancer growing on the presidency, or what?

Could be, MurryMom. I know that you "up and up" Democrats would love that to be the case because you are such believers in integrity--except when your own boys and girls are involved. Honesty and ethics haven't been one of your parties' strong points for the past eight years, MurryMom. Of course, you believe that only Republicans are capable of deception, being the good little brain-washed bimbo that you appear to be by your silly comments. I'll bet that you still believe Bill and Hillary Clinton's every denial, pathetic excuses, blamegames, empty platitudes and forgave them their silence, refusal to hand over documents, blatant parsing from their lawyers or an "I-can't-recall-even-though-I-was-in-charge" statement under oath when finally cornered. It might surprise your one-track mind to know that the now-sleazy Enron also had substantial dealings with Clinton (you, know, the guy that you gave pass after pass to his Tyson, Whitewater, Loral, etc. corporate buddies, business partners and contributers-in-trouble.) and his Democratic cronies.

Enron stinks to high heaven and should be investigated. At least Bush and his Administration are not foot-dragging on an investigation and haven't sent out any talking head sychophants to blame the Left Wing Conspiracy on this one, Dearie!!! Unlike you and your beloved Democratic Party that constantly plays the blamegame, winks at sexual harassment/rape allegations by their boys as "private, personal lifestyle choices," condones PERJURY from a President, encourages stonewalling investigations, mimics cries of "I can't recall" even when confronted by memos and witnesses to the contrary, has no problem with a witnesses' refusal to hand over materials/notes that mysteriously appear after the investigation has closed, looked the other way when evidence was missing, shredded, or deleted via numerous "administrative errors," shrugs their shoulders at fellow Democrats who have close ties to known contributers who have criminal records or shady dealings just as long as they vote to keep taxes high and abortion legal, MOST CONSERVATIVES KNOW HOW TO DEAL WITH THEIR OWN! Just ask a long line of Right-wing politicos who were forced to resign by their party because of their conduct.

If Bush or Cheney were somehow directly
involved in Enron's deception and there is proof positive, I say hang-em high. But receiving contributions or being part of a business headed by a dirty corporate CEO is not the exclusive domain of the Republican Party, last I heard. At least Bush isn't playing the stonewalling, spin game like his predeccessor was prone to do.

I think that Bush is a lot smarter than you give him credit for. I find it laughable that you call him Dumbya, especially since you still believe that "Honest" Bill and Hillary Clinton were innocent victims of a RWC and above board human beings. I think that you are pretty dumbya(self) for buying into the Clinton mythology, but then I remember dealing with your kind until I awoke from my long liberal nightmare. The most important thing that I have learned over the years is that Republicans and conservatives demand a lot more of their politicians than your kind does--that's just one of the reasons that I left the left behind...

114 posted on 01/10/2002 3:05:21 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
Ooops! I didn't have enough time to run my post through the spelling checker and re-draft. Oh, well, maybe you can flame me on my spelling and grammar errors. You sure aren't going to convince me that the left is right and the right is...whatever. Eight years of Clintonian rule was enough for me, Sweetie...
115 posted on 01/10/2002 3:10:15 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: boston_liberty
"On the heels of a new Justice Department inquiry into the failure of Enron Corp., President Bush has called for a review of the pension-plan practices that have cost Enron employees their life savings. "

No one will be able to hijack a plane using a box-cutter because passengers will look after themselves from now on. Similarly, no one should be able to cost employees their life savings because employees will look at their investments more closely. People will either transfer their money out of company stock or, if they can't, leave the company.

116 posted on 01/10/2002 4:22:35 PM PST by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Holden Magroin
The bottom line is that Bush is a Republican, so this is de facto "serious" stuff.

Nixon went down for running interference on his campaign team after they burglarized the Watergate (something he neither knew about or approved).

Newt went down for...sheesh, I can't even remember. Is it true he served divorce papers on his cancerous wife, or is that just lib bull**it? Well, regardless, he went down.

Livingston had an affair once upon a time, so he got the boot.

Packwood stole a few kisses in the elevator, and his career was over.

Now, let's take a look at some of the "trials and tribulations" of Democrats. Hmmm, let's see:

One of the Senate's current "stalwarts" used to be a poo-bah in the KKK (Byrd). Somehow, that hasn't seemed to hurt his career.

Another "stalwart" couldn't navigate his car across a bridge. Oh, yes...he's still a power-broker in the Senate.

Torricelli's just been given a pass and is headed toward re-election..never mind the bribes.

And let's not forget the worst of the bunch. Rape, treason, perjury and fornication in the Oval Office has landed him squarely...on the lecture circuit.

Yeah...Dubya ought to worry big-time.

Dangerous business, being a Republican.

117 posted on 01/10/2002 4:36:13 PM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
IF they did not have this stupid system of campaign contributions they would not have these messes coming up.

Contributions should be to a single fund. They the candidates draw from that fund for their financing.

If this type of thing went on in business, they would jail the people involved.

118 posted on 01/10/2002 4:45:29 PM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Oh a quote from St. louis' Riverfront Times, No thats not the most liberal rag in this town is it ?????

I think one could find a lot of Dems that recieved money from them as well. As a matter of fact thats the system we have and there is not a thing wrong with that...

Liberal innuendo aside I will wait untill I see any evidence of "knowledge of wrong doing and turning a blind eye" before I worry about this B.S.

And if that charge is advanced and sticks it would be very surprising. Also, that is still quite another thing from selling secrets to the enemy, then again with the media slant that it is I'm sure that the damage to the "working class" will far outway the damage done to our national security by Bill and Hill....

119 posted on 01/10/2002 4:46:45 PM PST by freethinkingman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
"http://csf.colorado.edu/forums/longwaves/2001/msg02185.html"

Good find!

120 posted on 01/10/2002 4:48:48 PM PST by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson