While Roe v. Wade is well-known and -reviled, how many know about the companion case, Doe v. Bolton, which finished what Roe v. Wade started by firmly establishing "abortion-on-demand."
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Damned HTML did not include a complete subdirectory listing for her picture. So much for good intentions...
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The entire abortion industry is based upon lies and deception.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
A fascinating story. I wonder why Hollywood has not made a movie?
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I am pro- life and have spoken to Ms. Norma (Jane Roe) one more than one occasion and I certainly do not revile her.
What should be noted as similar in both cases that these women were used by gender feminist fanaticals.
Cano by her lawyers and McCorvey by Sarah Weddington, her counsel. Neither
women had abortions and both are advocates for life today.
G-d Bless Sandra Cano and Norma McCorvey and a ......
BIG PROLIFE BUMP.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Sorry misread your post. I do revile Roe V. Wade. lol.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
it’s all about evil, lies and deceit. the whole pro-abortion movement, nothing has changed.
37 posted on
03/10/2015 6:12:47 PM PDT by
Coleus
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Both cases are based on Buck v Bell 1927. The majority decision was written by Oliver Wendell Holmes. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court was ex-POTUS William Taft. It seems to confirm people who think there is or was a Eugenics movement in this country. Buck v Bell 1927 was used as a defense by the Nazis in the Nuremburg trials. Buck v Bell 1927 has never been repealed.
38 posted on
03/20/2015 4:30:12 AM PDT by
citizen352
(Conspiracy Theory coincidences)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson