Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"At least Dingell didn't have to take off his scarf"
opinion journal ^ | 1-08-02 | James Taranto

Posted on 01/08/2002 2:26:49 PM PST by a_federalist

Edited on 04/23/2004 12:04:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

"For a Muslim woman to be forced to take off her headscarf in public is a violation of rights," wrote Hodan Hassan, a spokesman for the civil rights group. "These women believe covering their hair in public--essential to being modest--is a mandate from God."


(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/08/2002 2:26:49 PM PST by a_federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: a_federalist
Had the woman had a Dolly Parton bouffant anything could have been hidden there, Dingell would have had this security screeners a## had he not check him out.
2 posted on 01/08/2002 2:32:49 PM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Group Wants Apology From Airline Tuesday, January 8, 2002 Last updated at 3:23:09 PM PT

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

LINTHICUM, Md. -- A civil rights organization is demanding Northwest Airlines apologize for allegedly forcing a Muslim high school student to remove her head scarf at an airport security checkpoint.

In a letter to the Minnesota-based carrier, the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations said Monday the Dec. 18 incident was an example of religious harassment and an equivalent of a public strip search.

The council is asking the airline to investigate the incident at Baltimore-Washington International Airport and discipline the security guard.

"For a Muslim woman to be forced to take off her headscarf in public is a violation of rights," wrote Hodan Hassan, a spokesman for the civil rights group. "These women believe covering their hair in public - essential to being modest - is a mandate from God."

Northwest spokesman Kurt Ebenhoch said the airline was complying with security directives issued by the Federal Aviation Administration after Sept. 11.

"We regret any inconvenience that recent FAA-mandated procedures have created for any of our customers," Ebenhoch said.

According to the council, the 17-year-old was en route from her home in Alexandria, Va., to visit relatives in California. She wrote to the council about the incident.

Hassan said the council has received a dozen similar complaints about allegations of racial profiling during searches at airports since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. And it is not the first incident of alleged profiling at BWI since the attacks.

On Christmas Day, an Arab-American member of President Bush's Secret Service security detail was removed from an American Airlines flight after a pilot questioned his identity.

The agent was flown to Texas the next day after the airline manager spoke to a Secret Service supervisor.

The airline backed the pilot for the decision, saying the agent was uncooperative and had made loud and abusive comments.

Link

3 posted on 01/08/2002 2:35:26 PM PST by a_federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_federalist
As much as I hate the overreaction to 911, I relish the mental picture of Dingleberry standing in an airport with his pants around his ankles, being violated by a $7 an hour airport worker.
4 posted on 01/08/2002 2:41:32 PM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
What bothers me is after all these charges of racism, security screeners are going to save their zeal for people who won't get them in trouble. Grandma's, young children, white guys. Meanwhile someone wearing a scarf or burqua or whatever will get the vip boarding treatment. How do we know what's underneath the covering? Well we don't because we don't want to offend someones cultural religious sensitivities.
Then when some terrorist recruits a muslim woman to carry explosives onboard well, hey, another center fuel tank explosion. Wait, I mean the composites wore out in the tail, sorry. Or was it wake turbulence?
5 posted on 01/08/2002 2:42:46 PM PST by a_federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: a_federalist
If these ol'gals think God ordered them to cover their hair, then what does it mean to them that God failed to provide them with wings?

Clearly Moslem women are not meant to fly and none of them have any business out there trying to get on airplanes.

6 posted on 01/08/2002 2:44:38 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_federalist
Is that a Dingell in your pants or are you just glad to be here?
7 posted on 01/08/2002 2:48:42 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_federalist
Another good example of the arrogant and infuriating attitudes of these Islamic groups since Sept 11. The more I hear from the Islamics, the less I trust them.
8 posted on 01/08/2002 3:36:58 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
Yeah. Contrast the attitudes here. All muslims should be thanking their god they live in a country that doesn't deport them all.
Instead they go all self-righteously angry over actually being treated like any other passenger.
9 posted on 01/08/2002 3:53:15 PM PST by a_federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
Really! Remember that old movie where Pam Grier kept a small gun in her Afro;)? (I think it was "Coffy")
10 posted on 01/08/2002 8:44:39 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson