Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Lifers Cry Foul in NY Attorney General's Probe
CNSNews.com ^ | January 08, 2002 | Jason Pierce

Posted on 01/08/2002 4:57:10 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen

(CNSNews.com) - The founder of a pro-life crisis pregnancy center in New York City says his freedom of speech and religion are under attack by the state's attorney general who has launched an investigation into whether the center and others like it provided "deceptive" medical information to pregnant women.

The office of New York Democratic Attorney General Elliot Spitzer began issuing subpoenas to several crisis pregnancy centers Friday. Other centers expect to be served with the legal papers this week.

According to a subpoena obtained by CNSNews.com, Spitzer's initial investigation revealed that the centers "may have violated one or more ... statutes by misrepresenting the services they provide, diagnosing pregnancy and advising persons on medical options without being licensed to do so, and/or providing deceptive and inaccurate medical information."

Under orders of the subpoena, the centers, before Feb. 1, must provide copies of all advertisements, Web site addresses, services provided, staff who provide the services, training materials, blank forms, records of all agreements made, and a list of all persons who received any service from the clinics.

Chris Slattery, the founder of Expectant Mother Care, which operates five centers in New York City, says the investigation and "probable lawsuit" are "an attack on the heart and soul of the pro-life movement's compassionate wing."

"They have attacked the freedom of religion and speech, to counsel the doubtful women who are considering an abortion alternative like marriage and adoption," Slattery said.

Slattery has undertaken the task of gathering a legal team to defend the New York crisis pregnancy centers. He says there are more than 100 centers in the state, and 15 spread throughout the five boroughs of New York City. The centers have been in operation since the mid-1980s, offering women a variety of options to deal with their unwanted pregnancy, options other than abortion.

Because of complaints that the crisis pregnancy centers were failing to make clear what services they provided, a law was passed in the 1980s requiring the centers to label themselves "abortion alternatives" in phone books. Most of the centers offer adoption services, placement into maternity homes, free pre-natal care, free ultrasounds, free counseling, and free child care supplies after the child is born.

The pregnancy crisis centers do not take any public funds, only private donations. They are recognized as a 501(c) 3 charity. Churches, organizations, and individuals make up the crisis pregnancy centers' donor pool.

"What they really want us to do is to put crosses in our ads, say we are pro-life and [tell the public] 'don't call,'" Slattery said. "And if a woman does call, say 'don't come in because we don't offer abortions,' and if they do come in, then they want us to say 'please wait until we have a licensed professional to counsel you who will be morally neutral on abortion, who will give you non-directive counseling.'

"They seem to feel we are deceptive if we advertise under 'abortion alternatives,' that we offer confidential counseling, medical and safety information and free ultrasounds, when we do," he said.

Slattery said the next step for the crisis pregnancy centers is to "quash the subpoenas that [Spitzer's office] is issuing." Slattery said he also wants to uncover the "conspiracy between the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) and the attorney general to shut down the crisis pregnancy centers."

Slattery predicts a "snowball effect" if the subpoenas lead to lawsuits, and eventually lead to the demise of the crisis pregnancy center.

"This attack, if successful, will have ripple effects nationwide," Slattery said. "Because if they can successfully ban counseling by volunteer, lay people, this could spread across the country and literally cripple the volunteer movement that is the heart and soul of compassionate abortion alternatives counseling."

Spitzer's office refused to comment. Repeated calls placed to the NARAL were not returned.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/08/2002 4:57:10 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
I know of a pro-life center that was sued for two million by a pro-abort lady who came in just to find something to sue them about. The suit got HUGE news coverage, but when it was thrown out of court a year later, none of the media had a comment.
2 posted on 01/08/2002 5:05:46 AM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
How about suggesting to Slattery that he do an equivalent inquiry of abortion providers to see if they are misleading their clients when they don't inform them of the risks of the procedure or of the connection between abortion and breast cancer? Yeah, right. Slattery isn't really interested in the best interests of women.
3 posted on 01/08/2002 5:16:15 AM PST by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Stand Watch Listen
Elliot Spitzer, NY little Dictator. Elliot was also one of the Leaders in the Sue the Gun Manufacters game the Clintler's pushed.
5 posted on 01/08/2002 5:31:17 AM PST by Area51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdwright
Me either. A friend of mine, a Catholic nurse with six kids, who volunteered her time, was really upset with the lawsuit--she'd never had so much as a ticket--and the suit did a lot of temporary damage. She had been the intake worker on the original visit by the woman who sued, and kept wracking her brains for something she had done wrong...it turned her into a cynic, for a while...
6 posted on 01/08/2002 5:42:05 AM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Judith Anne
The point was to sue them to cost them money and drive them out of business.
8 posted on 01/08/2002 5:51:07 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Area51
Oops! I meant Spitzer, not Slattery.
9 posted on 01/08/2002 5:51:50 AM PST by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Well NY State I guess does not want to have a pro-life counseling service. Funny they do not require, Planned Parenthood (misnomer in a name since parenthood is the opposite of what they attempt) to provide truth in advertising of the affects of abortion.

They limit the right to protest and gather in front of the abortion mills.

They now want to prevent a open pro-life choice to mothers looking for an option other than the murder of their children.

They are limiting the legal choices and expressions available to the pro-life groups.
10 posted on 01/08/2002 5:53:53 AM PST by BobWNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdwright; AppyPappy
That WAS the point of the exercise, to demoralize them...my friend recovered her compassion, sadder but wiser...her place was in the same building as an abortion office...I picketed the abortionist's office, with placards on the sidewalk by the building, saying: "YOU DO HAVE A CHOICE! YOU DON'T HAVE TO KILL YOUR BABY!" I told my family that I might go to jail for it...my children said they would be so proud, if I did...but I wasn't arrested.

I think you're right about the priest in prison...I don't remember who it is, though...

11 posted on 01/08/2002 6:02:03 AM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Is it just me or does this have Hillary's signature on it somewhere?
12 posted on 01/08/2002 6:03:51 AM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
I'm going to give your questions a great big "Hmmmmmm....." bump. It's a good one.
13 posted on 01/08/2002 6:19:21 AM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
And another bump for the babies.
14 posted on 01/08/2002 10:45:04 AM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
You would think New York would have figured it out by now...
15 posted on 01/10/2002 3:15:23 AM PST by Hamilton2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
OH, dear Lord God! Crisis Pregnancy Centers are on the front lines standing in the gap to help women and their babies to be!

They are doing God's work - with millions of babies saved through their sacrificial and blessed work. And millions of mothers spared the lifetime wounds that come from making the USUAL UNINFORMED PLANNED PARENTHOOD GUIDED ABORTION DECISION!

Why can't we sue Planned Parenthood for false advertising in their name? It should be planned abortionhood! They should be countersued! WHY CAN'T THIS BE DONE?????

16 posted on 01/10/2002 3:33:29 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hamilton2; sweetliberty
Of course, these are the same people who elected Hillary.
17 posted on 01/10/2002 7:16:05 AM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson