Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Not to be disruptive (gasp!), but if you want to have a private conversation with Dan, why do it publicly?

Up until now, I wouldn't class you with the organized and persistent disruptors of Keyes threads. I was referring to the other two he called in to fight his battles for him.

As to my conversation with Dan? He made his broadbrush condemnation of Keyesters publicly, and he should apologize publicly.

Instead, he used you as cover to brush it all off as insignificant. But it's not.

682 posted on 01/10/2002 7:39:03 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
Up until now, I wouldn't class you with the organized and persistent disruptors of Keyes threads.

I don't want to get personal, EV, but up until now I wouldn't have classified you as paranoid. I'm not part of any organized group of people. I'm just expressing my opinion, as you are. And Dan didn't use me for anything. I've had no contact with Dan that you have not seen. You made public statements, and just like my public statements, they're up for public consumption and commentary. So I commented. I think you're a strong and smart enough person to handle it - I'm not wrong, am I?

For the record: I don't see a thread on Alan Keyes, twist my fake mustache and think, "Now's my chance to disrupt those Keyesters!" I just find it an interesting topic, so here I am.

692 posted on 01/10/2002 8:28:24 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson