Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: finnman69, all
Why does everyone seem to think this ship is any more vulnerable than any other vessel? Remember the ULCCs that shrugged off the exocet missiles during the 80s?

Re icebergs- if those are such a threat, why aren't they sinking ships now? Gosh, I don't know...radar?

Re cape horn- if the weather is such a threat, why aren't ships breaking up right now?

Re a couple of boarders could take it over- well, given that the article mentions a a security force of 2,000, that seems unlikely.

Re: 20 foot waves in the north atlantic- anybody here a naval architect w/professional knowledge of the relationship between beam-length ratios, DWD, and sea keeping? I don't either, but then I'm not speculating about something I'm completely ignorant about...

This whole thing may be a cmoplete scam-I have no idea about the actual practicality of the project, either in terms of the technology or the business plan- but based on the comments I've seen, neither do a lot of the folks commenting.

33 posted on 01/04/2002 8:04:57 AM PST by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fourdeuce82d
Actually its the same reason you don't seen monsters like Carnival Fun Ships rounding cape horn. They are built for calm water cruising. Only a few ships today like the QE2 are built for real transatlantic travel.
38 posted on 01/04/2002 8:12:07 AM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson