Doh...I hate it when that happens.
Posted on 01/03/2002 1:10:30 AM PST by kattracks
An Arab-American Secret Service agent assigned to protect President Bush has hired an attorney after being kicked off a commercial flight on Christmas Day, officials said yesterday.
The agent, whose name is being withheld for security reasons, was questioned about his identity before being barred from the American Airlines flight.
Civil rights attorney Christy Lopez of the Washington law firm Relman & Associates has taken the case, said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
The council has filed a civil rights complaint alleging the pilot ordered the armed agent off the plane only because he was an Arab-American.
Bush said last week that he would be "madder than heck" if his bodyguard was booted from the flight because of his ethnicity.
The American-Islamic group announced yesterday that a passenger who was sitting next to the agent on American Airlines Flight 363 has come forward alleging the agent was "kicked off the plane because of his race."
Secret Service spokesman Jim Mackin declined to comment.
American Airlines claims the pilot ordered the agent off the flight to Dallas-Fort Worth because his paperwork contained "inconsistencies."
Here is an excerpt from another thread that indicates you are wrong.
In an internal American Airlines report obtained by CNN the pilot claims the agent "became very hostile" after being told that initial documents he submitted during a pre-flight security check were inadequate."The form (submitted by the agent) was unreadable because it was a carbon-copy and there were missing items," the pilot told American Airlines. "I then had the agent come back and re-check his credentials" and fill out a new form, which, he said, the agent "filled out improperly."
"I was given a third improperly filled out (form). This had no signature of the (law enforcement officer), no phone number," the pilot told the airline.
"I absolutely felt correct in having this individual's identification validated," the pilot wrote in his report. "After three improper (forms) and the behavior of this individual, I needed to be 100 (percent) sure of his credentials."
The American Airlines pilot said he was "acting in the best interests" of his crew when he decided to eject the agent from the flight, which was scheduled to fly from Washington, D.C. to Texas, where the agent had been assigned to guard President Bush.
The agent claims he was a victim of racial profiling.
If you should discover that you have been making invalid claims, will you be back to correct the mistake. I support the pilot's decision 100%.
Your failure to act in a prudent manner does not mitigate against others who do act responsibly. :)
Okay, so you're saying you can't back up your claims?
Really?
I agree. At the very least, his Clearance Application forms need extra scrutiny, and his polygraph needs an immediate update.
And the rest of the allegations on the paperwork are just that--allegations. The trick to dealing with AA is to understand that their public relations and customer relations personnel are taught to tell any lie, no matter how transparent, than to admit to anything that might embarrass AA.
You want to think that one through again? If your scenario pans out, the "addressed effectively" part will boil down to "angry muslims with guns shall not be impeded when boarding airplanes". Think about how [insert any ol' special interest group name here] got things "resolved" via the mechanisms you advocate.
I'm afraid if you can't do this, it will look like you fabricated your opinion.
And I would ask. . .'why' should he assume it is racism to be removed from a flight; why not caution, security. . .confusion re his papers, carrying a gun and an attitudein addition to being an Arab American. ; it surely was NOT just because he was an Arab-American. . .
Sorry, but YOUR bias does not fly, and neither did he that day.
There is 'reasonable' and there is the 'unreasonable' ie Political Correctness; the absence of reason in favor of the 'feel good' which is what PC embraces (it's totalitarian design more sinister of course).
IAE, you have probably read by now how Bill Clinton favored the politically correct during his Administration and so refused even reasonable and legitimate steps to prevent terrorism, lest he make a constituency upset. . .romping in the Oval Office was easier and much more satisfying of course. . .
. . .Political correctness and the Liberalism that proscribes is an enabler for terrorism; and PC is not the absence of racism by the way; just a tortured feel good version of it.
Worse, innocent Americans have now paid their lives for it. . .
If he were Christian, the media would fall all over themselves to describe the guy as an "Arab Christian". The fact that nothing is said, tells me that he is a Muslim.
(Just reading between the lines.)
Doh...I hate it when that happens.
Do you really think that the nation was made safer by harassing a Secret Service agent? Doesn't that indicate to you that the folks responsible for that idiocy don't know the difference between their hindquarters and this particular hole in the ground?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.