Replies

As much as I would love to beleive that he has lost his power, I beleive that he has enough power to still be dangerous for this country. His power comes from his ability to raise dollars for those that make the laws, like Hillary.

He can be dangerous, but he doesn't have enough power to appeal to interns. Who would go with a man who lost his power and is known to trash the women he's uses? He's such a jerk, even young women know it. Who knows, maybe even the children of the nation are on to him. I'm not saying he's obvious, but if you can't see what he is, your IQ is below 75.

As much as I would love to believe that he has lost his power, I believe that he has enough power to still be dangerous for this country.

Well said:

British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain responded the same way to the Nazis in 1930s Europe as President Clinton did to terrorists in 1990s America. As long as military intervention remained unpopular with the British citizens, Chamberlain was satisfied with letting Hitler do as he pleased. No military intervention, just big words ("I believe it is peace for our time." Once again, maybe if we say it enough, it will come true). But Chamberlain's failure to contain Hitler, even if it meant using military force, soon led to World War II and it was left to Winston Churchill to right Chamberlain's wrongs. Sixty years later, Bill Clinton's failure to contain bin Laden, even after repeated terrorists attacks on Americans here and abroad, allowed the attacks of September 11th to take place and now it is left to George W. Bush to act where Clinton did not.