Skip to comments.
Questions Line the Road for Nascar
New York Times ^
| December 30, 2001
| ROBERT LIPSYTE
Posted on 12/31/2001 5:04:34 PM PST by 07055
THE YEAR AT SPEED 2001
Questions Line the Road for Nascar
By ROBERT LIPSYTE
...... The question that was never asked is whether we really need this particular form of sporting entertainment at all. ..... Certainly, it's not asked inside this restrictively white Christian male preserve that pollutes the environment, wastes natural resources and traditionally sacrifices safety for speed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
See remainder of article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/30/sports/othersports/30LIPS.html
or in "Source" link above.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
My apologies if this has been posted before---I could not find any articles about NASCAR during the past seven days.
1
posted on
12/31/2001 5:04:34 PM PST
by
07055
To: 07055
You forgot to post a TREE-HUGGING, ENVIOUS, RANTING LIBERAL BARFAROONI ALERT!
To: 07055
you forgot to mention sponsor of...."winston cup racing", evil tobacco
3
posted on
12/31/2001 5:15:39 PM PST
by
hoot2
To: 07055
Must be a Communist follower of Marx. No one should have anything they don't need so that the wealth can be better spent for the betterment of society.
To: 07055
The question that was never asked is whether we really need this particular form of sporting entertainment at all. ..... That's because in the recorded history of man there has never been anyone that stupid. Until now.
To: 07055
...... The question that was never asked is whether we really need this particular form of sporting entertainment at all. ..... Certainly, it's not asked inside this restrictively white Christian male preserve that pollutes the environment, wastes natural resources and traditionally sacrifices safety for speed.Imagine if I wrote this about professional basketball:
"...... The question that was never asked is whether we really need this particular form of sporting entertainment at all. ..... Certainly, it's not asked inside this restrictively black preserve that denigrates teamwork, glorifies promiscuity and violence against women, and entices young black boys to waste their time on the playground in the futile hope of making the pros, rather than furthering their education and becoming productive members of society.
Would I be a racist, or what?
6
posted on
12/31/2001 5:23:56 PM PST
by
Arleigh
To: 07055
I guess this guy won't be available to help me with my LT-1/supercharger project.
To: 07055
I don't want/need to read the rest of this piece and keep my dinner down. These socialist pukes just can't keep their left pointing noses out of others business. Maybe if NASCAR would adopt an EEO policy to ensure that minority-based drivers, mechanics, tire makers, fuel producers, etc. etc. would participate to the point that the percentage of ownership fell below 50%, then do you think these scum would be satisfied? I don't. These slime won't be happy until they could outlaw this sport for all the people that love to watch it. What the race teams ought to do is send this airhead all the worn tires left over from one race - send them to his place of work.
8
posted on
12/31/2001 5:27:28 PM PST
by
Rockyrich
To: 07055
this restrictively white Christian male preserve that pollutes the environment, wastes natural resources and traditionally sacrifices safety for speed No need to click on the link. That little bit of screed tells me all I need to know about the writer's point of view.
9
posted on
12/31/2001 5:32:19 PM PST
by
SamKeck
To: 07055
The poster's clever redaction notwithstanding,
the writer does not just target Nascar.
The question that was never asked is whether we really need this particular
form of sporting entertainment at all. It's a question that is never asked inside a
sport, not in boxing, murderous and exploitive, not in big- time college football,
dangerous and corruptive of higher education. Certainly, it's not asked inside
this restrictively white Christian male preserve that pollutes the environment,
wastes natural resources and traditionally sacrifices safety for speed.
10
posted on
12/31/2001 5:39:14 PM PST
by
gcruse
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: gcruse
The poster's clever redaction notwithstanding, the writer does not just target Nascar. The question that was never asked is whether we really need this particular form of sporting entertainment at all. It's a question that is never asked inside a sport, not in boxing, murderous and exploitive, not in big- time college football, dangerous and corruptive of higher education.
Yes, I did leave out that sentence. I left it out because his comments about boxing or college football are not based on racist and anti-religious bigotry, as are his NASCAR comments.
12
posted on
12/31/2001 6:01:13 PM PST
by
07055
To: 07055
But Nascar's founding family, the Frances, has always seemed fearful of promoting characters that might become bigger than the sport and thus have the power to get a better deal from management by threatening to create a rival league. As a northeastern ny times reader but cardcarrying conservative, allow me to translate for those of you who are lucky enough to avoid living in this liberal-infested world. This article, even including the disgusting quote that the poster correctly focused on, is by comparison not so bad. I'd put this piece in the file for "we're intellectuals but we really like sports too, so we hope you'll think we're just one of the guys." It's hard to tell, I admit, but I think that's what this article was after.
I thought the article did raise one good point, quoted above, which is that the NASCAR folks are likely to want to avoid the CART/IRL problem that has afflicted indy-car racing.
Y'all have to learn to be tolerant of these people. I live around 'em, and I can tell you -- the efforts of the males of the species to actually act like men should be enncouraged. They need all the help they can get.
To: 07055
Some need it, others don't. It is up to those that want it to decide if we have it, though. All else is irrelevant...unless of course you are the New York Times.
14
posted on
12/31/2001 6:27:39 PM PST
by
BJungNan
To: isthisnickcool
Ha! I was thinking the same thing. I was wondering if this guy would like to go for a spin in my Dad's 66 Big Block Shelby Mustang.
To: Channel_Islands_EANx_Diver
Shelby Mustang. VROOOOMMMMM!!!!!!
To: 07055
Of course Lipsyte would be against the existence of NASCAR (and his paper can't even get the name right -- as NASCAR is an acronym, it should be written in all caps, not as "Nascar.") The outcry of sadness over Dale Earnhardt's death left most of the New York Times' readership feeling ignorant, as they had never even heard of the guy.
To: DJ88
BUMP!
(You go get'em girl!)
To: Rockyrich
Actually a lot of leftist bile launching has "snobbism" and "classism" at the roots - they don't like guns or gun shows either, knowing that "they're not like us"...
19
posted on
12/31/2001 10:50:28 PM PST
by
185JHP
To: isthisnickcool
I guess this guy won't be available to help me with my LT-1/supercharger project.Yup, and the jerk would really get upset with the blue bottle and red button in my 64 Cobra.
20
posted on
12/31/2001 11:22:42 PM PST
by
Cobra64
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson