Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62
"Balanced budgets have very little to do with a growing economy. The economy grew like wildfire in the 1980's without anything near a balanced budget."

Frankly, I think the case could be made that the balanced budget contributed to economic prosperity (less gubmint spending). But, the point is that balancing the budget was a conservative goal which x42 glommed onto as a part of his "centrist" marketing scheme. Remember him parroting this phrase over and over and over again during the campaign, "...it's paid for in my balanaced budget"?

135 posted on 01/01/2002 7:42:52 AM PST by RightRules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: RightRules
Frankly, I think the case could be made that the balanced budget contributed to economic prosperity (less gubmint spending). But, the point is that balancing the budget was a conservative goal which x42 glommed onto as a part of his "centrist" marketing scheme. Remember him parroting this phrase over and over and over again during the campaign, "...it's paid for in my balanaced budget"?

I agree with your point that an efficient government is good for the economy, but a balanced budget is an effect, not a cause. Now the Dems are saying that a balanced budget is necessary for a growing economy, or even worse, saying a government surplus is necessary. Surpluses take money out of the private sector, and are eventually used to make the government bigger and more wasteful.

143 posted on 01/01/2002 8:09:17 AM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson