Skip to comments.
India, Pakistan prepare nukes, troops for war
Drudge Report ^
Posted on 12/30/2001 8:10:51 PM PST by GulliverSwift
The most alarming signs are preparations in both states for the use of nuclear-tipped missiles.
Intelligence agencies have learned of indications that India is getting its short-range Prithvi ballistic missiles ready for use. The missiles are within range of the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, Gertz reports in Monday's WASH TIMES... MORE...
Meanwhile, Pakistan is mobilizing its Chinese-made mobile M-11 missiles, also known as the Shaheen, which have been readied for movement from a base near Sargodha, Pakistan.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-131 next last
To: Stultis
The west coast will be affected about as much as the entire US, what information you going on their? I don't think you know what you're talking about.
81
posted on
12/30/2001 10:02:50 PM PST
by
Scythian
To: Lazarus Long
I don't..I wish I could hook you up with a site..I learned from a Westinghouse employee who called in frequnetly to the network line (My prior job with them). He was all up on yields. Can I freep mail you when I do find out? (Now you have me curious)
Comment #83 Removed by Moderator
To: unix
The largest bomb ever lit by the US (at Bikini) was 15-16 megatons which was about twice as big as they expected due to the unexpected interaction of the lithium in the fusion process. That must have been a real pucker-factor increaser, can you even imagine?
However, the USSR tested one with a design yield of 100-150 megatons, damped down to 50 for the test in a rare display of common sense for the Soviets.
84
posted on
12/30/2001 10:07:08 PM PST
by
mvpel
To: Fee
My wife and I both carry a 3 day survival kit of food, water, first aid kit, flashlight, basic tools, a change of clothes etc. in the trunk of each car (in case we have to evacuate seperately). We have agreed to a meeting place (her mom's, small town, South Texas) and have charted and driven a route there that doesn't involve using the highways. Our home is also well stocked. I have done all I feel can do to protect us in case of secondary fall-out drifting over Houston. And, because I have done all I feel I can do.....not going to worry about it anymore.
85
posted on
12/30/2001 10:07:43 PM PST
by
larry h
Comment #86 Removed by Moderator
To: Fee
I don't disagree with you about being prepaired, Just that the India - Pakistan thing is not going to effect us from a sandpoint of nuke risk. IMHO, if India could take out Pakistan, that would save us the trouble.
87
posted on
12/30/2001 10:10:43 PM PST
by
babygene
To: mvpel
Per your post...Umm..DAMN!???
To: Lazarus Long
That would be excellent...Thanks.
To: LenS
Boy do you love to make unsupported assertions:
Too late for forbidding -- once Pakistani-backed terrorists attacked the heart of the Indian govt.,
The terrorists were NOT Pakistani backed. Not even India is claiming this. Pakistan stopped backing Kashmiri terrorists quite some time ago. If you have any evidence that Pakistan was backing these terrorists, please provide it and include your sources.
It is true that the terrorists were operating from within Pakistan, but that is quite a different thing from Pakistan sponsoring them. Pakistan has already made 50+ arrests and frozen the accounts of the leader of the organization suspected to be responsible.
our ability to restrain India went out the window from both a moral standpoint and a practical one.
India is no match militarily to us, and they depend on us economically. They would never dare cross us.
Pakistani efforts to catch Al-Qaeda have been weak
Prove it (and no, the word of the Afgan interior minister does not constitute proof).
and I'm still not convinced that Pakistan won't recreate the Taliban in a new form once we've moved on.
More unproven assertions.
Better to smash them now while their nuclear arsenal is small and limited in range.
Yeah, having them lob a nuclear bomb on our forces in Afganistan would really help us out in our war against Al Qaeda.
And since we're already trying to create a stable regime in Afganistan, why not spend a few more billion dollars and do the same thing Pakistan while we're at it? Nationbuilding is just so much fun, you know.
Seriously, have you thought any of this through? I suspect you are allowing your justifiable hatred of Mohammedanism cloud your judgement.
Comment #91 Removed by Moderator
To: traditionalist
"If you have any evidence that Pakistan was backing these terrorists, please provide it and include your sources."
If Pakistan doesn't support them, why doesn't she arest them and turn them over to India? Nothing would ne better than getting rid of the islamic state with the largest population. Islamic's are evil.
92
posted on
12/30/2001 10:16:22 PM PST
by
babygene
To: unix
"and you 'What about our troops in Paki...Guess what? The Military is a dangerous job, get used to the idea..." The question will be moot if our military goes up in smoke in Crapistan, einstein.
93
posted on
12/30/2001 10:18:21 PM PST
by
Don Joe
To: LenS
"But then your US map probably shows the CSA still with plenty of slave holdings." More likely, it shows two regions: "San Francisco" and "The Rest of the Country".
94
posted on
12/30/2001 10:19:46 PM PST
by
Don Joe
To: babygene
1) Pakistan has arrested them and
2) You too seem to be allowing your legitimate hatred of Mohammedanism cloud your judgment.
Eliminate Pakistan indeed! Just what do you propose to replace it with?
To: traditionalist
That was my whole point too. Pakistan just arrested 50+ terrorists but it never happened 3 months ago. Back then 50,000 militants in Pakistan were burning U.S. flags and holding up poster signs of Bin Ladin. But today, Pakistan is beging to arrest terrorists and hopefully take care of the problem. I think the treat of an all out war with India, possibly nuclear, has helped change public opinion in Pakistan about wiping out terrorism.
96
posted on
12/30/2001 10:26:08 PM PST
by
sandonca
To: traditionalist
"You too seem to be allowing your legitimate hatred of Mohammedanism cloud your judgment." Yes I hate evil, and they have shown themselves to be evil.
"Eliminate Pakistan indeed! Just what do you propose to replace it with?" Make it part of India... or better yet, thousands of square miles of glass.
97
posted on
12/30/2001 10:29:20 PM PST
by
babygene
To: traditionalist
I meant "begining" to arrest terrorists lol. They will be begging to arrest terrorists in a few more day though.
98
posted on
12/30/2001 10:29:30 PM PST
by
sandonca
To: Lazarus Long
There's a listing of all the test series that the US conducted at
http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/Usa/Tests/. According to this document, the last atmospheric test was July 1962.
Let's see... The Ranger series' largest shot was 22kt on Feb 6, 1951, the Buster Easy was 31kt on November 5, 1951, Upshot-Knothole Simon was 43kt on April 25, 1953, Upshot-Knothole Climax was 61kt on June 4, 1953, ah, but here's the largest ever -- I knew I'd find it by flipping through the list:
Test: |
Hood |
Time: |
11:40.00.4 5 July 1957 (GMT) |
Location: |
NTS, Area 9a |
Test Height and Type: |
1500 Foot Balloon |
Yield: |
74 kt |
Hood was the largest atmospheric test ever conducted at NTS (and in continental U.S.). This was a test of a two-stage thermonuclear device designed by UCRL (University of California Radiation Laboratory), even though the U.S. government stated at the time that no thermonuclear tests were being conducted in Nevada. The design was intended to fill a gap in 300-400 lb. thermonuclear warhead technology, and was tested at reduced yield. The predicted yield was 60-80 kt. The device used a boosted Swan primary (which gave yields of 12-19 kt in other tests during Plumbbob). About 7 kt of the overall yield was from fusion. The device was a small diameter system (12.1 inches) and was 42.2 inches long. Total device weight was 393 lb. The test also included troop maneuvers by 2500 Marines, and air operations by 124 aircraft.
Hood (54 K) Hood (34 K)
99
posted on
12/30/2001 10:30:23 PM PST
by
mvpel
To: larry h
I am glad you are prepared. Unfortunately in NJ you would be regarded as borderline survival nut. I keep about one week of emergency supply for my family based on past state emergencies such as one year we had 11 major snow storms, which atleast 3 were declared emergencies as well as two severe floods caused by Noreaster weather conditions. The worst one actually closed the state roads for 72 hours, and it took the state/FEMA to restablish normal conditions in about a week. I was the few in my community that had food and water. After 9/11 I figure more would be prepared, but unfortunately I am still the lonely voice in the wilderness. Maybe I should move to Texas.
100
posted on
12/30/2001 10:32:28 PM PST
by
Fee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson