[dcwusmc]

The principle is universal, clown-meister. Prior restraint is prior restraint, no matter the subject. Prohibition of speech or possession of objects = ZERO difference, except to liberal control freaks who want total and unlimited control over the lives and property of others. This is YOU, roscoe, a control FREAK. Same as a 'RAT. You and Billy Jeff and Teddy No-pants. Wow. The evil triumvirate. THERE is dubya's axis of evil!

[Roscoe]

Prior restraint is prior restraint, no matter the subject.

Smoking crack isn't freedom of speech. Slamming smack isn't the right to keep and bear arms.

Continually drawing such false equivalencies is SOP for the "legalize all drugs" cult.

[secretagent]

Prior restraint refers to First Amendment issues solely, at least in the first few Google pages I scanned.

Please cite some text, or explain it yourself. You may have a new, valuable principle here.