Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cultural Jihad;Roscoe
I'm still waiting for a plain English explanation of where in the Constitution is says the Feds get to regulate a substance like marijuana. Commerce clause? How?

I am a mainstream Repblican, not a Libertarian. I don't do anything stronger than cognac, but it beats me how arresting stoners makes me either safer or freer. Conversely, for every fewer federal employee I am measurably and materially freer, and safer! That is why I, and tens of millions of other conservatives, have no sympathy at all for the Drug War.

183 posted on 12/30/2001 3:52:55 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: eno_
Conversely, for every fewer federal employee I am measurably and materially freer, and safer!

Ain't it the truth! Which reminds me, another fun aspect of the WosD is the potential for corrupting the Armed Forces. I don't want to see the Army become as corrupt as the DEA or the border patrol or the Sheriff's Dept that manufactured its own speed (somewhere in FL, IIRC). In an earlier post I mentioned that repeal will most likely reduce the amount of lying in our society; ditto for corrpution - it won't go away, but there would be less reason to bribe.

187 posted on 12/30/2001 4:19:44 PM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: eno_
I'm still waiting for a plain English explanation of where in the Constitution is says the Feds get to regulate a substance like marijuana. Commerce clause? How?

For an explaination of this you have to go back to FDR. He established the governments authority to regulate virtually anything you might have or any activity you might engage in. The Orwellian logic goes something like this:

The federal government has the right to regulate interstate commerce. This gives them the right to prohibit your ownership of anything that could conceiveably be bought, sold, or trade, because you might buy, sell, or trade with someone in another state. A large part of the federal government's expansion, including the WOD is based on this idea that "regulating interstate commerce" actually means "regulating potentially interstate potential commerce".

188 posted on 12/30/2001 4:23:26 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: eno_
Have you actually looked?

Here's a starting point:

http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/agency/csa.htm

227 posted on 12/30/2001 6:14:55 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson