Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America First: Why we need to examine our insane Foreign policy
self | 12/29/2001 | Demidog

Posted on 12/29/2001 9:27:49 AM PST by Demidog

I am not an America hater by any stretch of the imagination. Nor are the plethora of folks calling for a re-examination of our foreign policies. But that's what we're called.

I wish I knew why.

I really don't want to be against any American. I don't like being on the butt end of insults. So if there were a way to somehow explain what it is that bothers me about our foreign policy without the resultant cries of "traitor! treason! Islam firster!" I would.

One of the main problems apears to be that any "agreement" with bin Laden and his band of murdering thugs is seen to be support. Nothing could be further from the truth. It is probably true that bin Laden knows that water is tantamount to life in the desert. If I agree with this, I am no more supporting bin Laden than you are by agreeing.

When we decry any actions taken by Israel, we are "anti-semites." When Israel admitted that they had set a booby trap near an area where children played and 5 Palestinian boys died when it went off, you couldn't get near the topic without being ridiculed.

This is puzzling to me. There is nothing wrong per se with Israel and certainly not Jews, but for certain they are not perfect. For some, Israel is perfection and any criticism is tantamount to racism. Those who disagree are shouted down with such fervor it makes one pause.

American policies aren't perfect either. It is arguable for instance that John Wayne's death from cancer could be attributed to nuclear tests performed back in the 40's. Movie locations happened to be in the area where tests occurred. Many film industry professionals who worked on movies filmed in Nevada died from cancer including that great American we called "the Duke."

Many soldiers who were in the vicinity of those tests also died from cancer.

Why is it an indictment on all of America to bring such mistakes to light? In general, the American population has no say so in the slightest regarding these sorts of activities nor do they have much say in our foreign policy.

But as usual, it is the American population that has to accept the consequences of Policy mistakes made by the government. To say that those who object to this "hate America" is completely absurd.

The truth is quite the opposite.

I love America. And those who decry our foreign policy blunders and the theft of our hard earned money that is necessary in order to carry out these blunders also love America. We're simply tired of having to pay the price for those mistakes, while those who carry them out never have to suffer the consequences.

One of the most bizarre claims by those who are calling us "America haters" and "Islam firsters" is that terorrists are simply angry that we are so democratic as a nation and love freedom. These terrorists "hate freedom" and thus hate America and Americans. They're "jealous," in other words, of our prosperity.

This is about as brilliant an analysis as claiming that Timothy McVeigh was upset that he was no longer an employee of the federal government and thus took out his jealosy and rage on that same federal government.

It is the analysis of the simpleton.

The fact is, we only know what the terrorists claim. Not that it matters much. The opinions of mass murderers are not that important. Clearly however, this is not what any of the terrorists are saying. What they are saying is that they believe themselves to be oppressed by our foreign intervention.

When students took Iranian embassy employees hostage, their reason given for such extraordinary measures was American meddling in Iranian internal affairs.

The Shah of Iran was our personally hand-picked leader for their country. The CIA had, in the time period between the time we basically annexed Iran during WWII, purposefully destroyed opposition to the Shah by using tactics they had learned in South America.

None of those tactics were even remotely related to "freedom" or the principles upon which this nation was founded. They were the actions of a government that believed the Iranian people were chattle and were not worthy of chosing their own leadership.

So what happened? A number of Americans paid the price for our meddling. When we allowed the Shah to enter America to receive medical treatment, the last straw was put upon the back of that proverbial camel.

And that is not to mention the American lives that were sacrificed in a botched rescue attempt. For some, these lives are expendable. They are the price a nation pays for being a "super power." I agree with that assesment. But I don't think we need to be a superpower. I don't think we need to meddle in the affairs of other nations in order to protect our borders.

As is proven time and time again, such meddling has a high price.

And therein lies the rub. Dying in order to defend this nation from an attacking force is national defense and is noble. Sending young men and women across the globe to secure oil fields and preserve the "American way of life" is a sick project. I for one, am not willing to lose a single American for the cynical goal of sub-dollar-a-gallon fuel for my SUV.

If that is the measure of value for an American life then you can call me an America hater all day long and I will be proud to wear that badge.

I criticize our foreign policies because they result in the deaths of American soldiers and citizens at home and abroad. In no way do I criticize Americans. In the aftermath of the Trade Center attacks, it wasn't the government that responded with such ferocity and bravery. It was the average American.

The Beaurocrats were busy playing CYA and letting us know that none of this was their fault. In the meantime, Americans came up with over 60 million dollars in cash and even more in valuable resources in spite of the fact that they are taxed to the extreme in order to pay for the very policies that helped to incubate the attacks of 9/11.

America proved it's greatness in the response to the attacks. The government proved it's complete disregard for human liberty by passing laws which violate the spirit and letter of the Supreme law of the land. Even while the fires were still burning.

America is a great nation and is full of great people. Unfortunately its leaders have no respect for its people or its laws. Pointing this out is not showing hate for anything but the lawbreakers who do so.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 961-978 next last
To: anniegetyourgun
Amen.
301 posted on 12/29/2001 2:21:25 PM PST by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Libertarian-Socialists like Emma Goldman claimed that property is theft.

And that off-topic troll is supposed to concern me why? Why don't you explain why you think that Orthodox Jews who oppose foreign aid to Israel are anti-Semites?

302 posted on 12/29/2001 2:22:26 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Eternal_Bear
Yes, there are a lot of dual nationals. I do not care for any international body to settle our own national interests, but you should be aware of the myriad of supreme court decisions surrounding this issue. Basically the supreme court held that the only way one can lose one's citizenship is by formal renunciation (that is, it must be explicit and take place at a US government office), or by taking up arms (or serving in) a foreign army engaged in hostilities against the USA (Johnny Walker, pay attention!). The state department tried to strip citizenship from many people over the years for voting in foreign elections and whatnot, but was almost always overturned by the USSC.
303 posted on 12/29/2001 2:26:08 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Libertarian-Socialists

Kinda like the Bronco-Raiders or the chocolate-vanillas, right?

304 posted on 12/29/2001 2:26:19 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Good job - outstanding read - thank you. We're with you! JL
305 posted on 12/29/2001 2:27:04 PM PST by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Ok, demidog. I am happy that you answered no. Then it is ok with you that we continue the war on terrorism and continue our support of Israel because those are the things that Bin Laden and his irk have insisted that we not do to be safe from terrorism. Thanks for your support.

And since you do believe that we must protect ourselves from terrorism and continue on our present course on foreign policy, I apologise for my unkind remarks.

306 posted on 12/29/2001 2:29:29 PM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Libertarian-Socialists, like their philosophical descendents, used the term "theft" irrationally.

"Taxation is theft" became a substitute for "property is theft."

The hatred of America, her laws, institutions, foreign policy, etc., continued with little change.

307 posted on 12/29/2001 2:29:41 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Eternal_bear
See this website because it covers a lot of the issues re: Dual nationalism in great detail (it's not a government site but I've read all the site and believe him to be accurate).
308 posted on 12/29/2001 2:30:28 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
"Yes, I know that he is capable of handling himself well. I'm letting you know that his ideas are shared by some others. "

There are quite a few of us around who support the government in this war.

"If you have spcific difference, then voice it. That's what FR is all about."

I thought that I have been doing that all along. Have I not made myself clear?

309 posted on 12/29/2001 2:31:23 PM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Kinda like the Bronco-Raiders or the chocolate-vanillas, right?

More like the Big-Endians and the Little-Endians.

310 posted on 12/29/2001 2:33:01 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: lodwick
Thanks alot. Appreciate it.
311 posted on 12/29/2001 2:33:43 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
You draw conclusions that cannot be drawn from my answer of your question. You're a troll.
312 posted on 12/29/2001 2:35:59 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
BIG BUMP
313 posted on 12/29/2001 2:36:39 PM PST by Unicorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
BIG BUMP
314 posted on 12/29/2001 2:36:40 PM PST by Unicorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Who do you think "picked them?"

You didn't ask me, so I am not invited to your question.

Don't matter, I am reading this. So I will answer the best I know how.

When asked about running for President, GW said he wasn't.

Contributions for his campaign poored in.

He said he would consider running. Laura said she didn't want him to. The twins said they didn't want him to.

Then he did. He won.

Did someone force him to become President? Did he just say he didn't want to be, so we would vote for him?

I don't know who "picks them".

But it seems someone or something does.

315 posted on 12/29/2001 2:38:19 PM PST by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Libertarian-Socialists, like their philosophical descendents, used the term "theft" irrationally.

So what. What relevance does it have to this thread?

316 posted on 12/29/2001 2:40:40 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers; roscoe; Milehi
I thought that I have been doing that all along. Have I not made myself clear?

No, you've been clear and right on top of things. Even congenial, unlike roscoe who seems to favor government subisidies to the Oakland Raiders, the sworn ememies to America and all forms of life on this planet.

317 posted on 12/29/2001 2:41:18 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: carenot
Candidates choose to run.
318 posted on 12/29/2001 2:42:26 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
What relevance does it have to this thread?

Your use of the term "theft" to describe support for Israel was what?

319 posted on 12/29/2001 2:45:53 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Candidates choose to run.

And others are born in to it. Kind of like aristocrats.

320 posted on 12/29/2001 2:46:13 PM PST by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 961-978 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson