Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

J’Accuse
lewrockwell.com ^ | December 24, 2001 | Michael Peirce

Posted on 12/26/2001 6:34:07 AM PST by tberry

J’Accuse

by Michael Peirce

There has been a lot of criticism of LewRockwell.com on FreeRepublic, an ostensibly conservative discussion site. Much good comes out of that site, including excellent coverage of the latest war. Patriotism is considered de rigueur there and many of those who post are quite conversant with the constitution.

Others have never heard of it. LRC is referred to by some Freepers as a "blame America first" site. They are correct in supposing that LRC writers including myself are not gushing over the Republican Party. It is flawed thinking however, to suppose that we are by default, supporters of the left and are not patriotic.

I’m tired of taking this on the chin, and for several reasons. First, I was myself fighting communists when many of these guys were potty training. I’ve seen Communism up close and personal – with me it’s not just dislike of a political system – it’s hatred for a devilish secular heresy and yes, I believe this heresy, this dreadful murderous communism has come to America.

Giving a blank check to government is the quickest way to find ourselves under the shadow of the gulag and that won’t be pretty. I base this conclusion on a consistent pattern of government support for policies that harm America.

So I’m firing back with an accusation or two of my own and for reasons that should be obvious I chose to title this after the famous case from the end of the nineteenth century where the French government protected itself by blaming an innocent man for an act of treason committed by another man, a man who was in government. They were afraid it would make the government look bad. What could be worse?

That innocent man, Alfred Dreyfus, was falsely accused of treason, and wrongly convicted and sent to Devil’s Island. A guilty man went free because of his support for a corrupt government. A writer named Emile Zola made this a cause celebre when he wrote J’Accuse , an indictment of the government – ultimately Dreyfus was released, but not before Zola was accused of libel and spent ten years in exile. Justice was not the issue – Zola had dared to question the government and government had chosen Dreyfus as a scapegoat which was to have been the end of the story in their minds .

Lets consider the issues and use the facts to consider if government deserves our unswerving support.

Government most certainly did not make America great. We are, or were, great because of what we as Americans did, what we built and produced, and what we believed. We as a people were fairly devout and honored God, family and country. We worked hard and earned money that we kept for our own families. When the government clinched its fist against the Southern states there was a fringe benefit – the income tax. American no longer had control over their own finances. World War I, that least necessary of wars, sealed the tax in gold and FDR brought us the glory of income tax withholding. Nixon took us off the gold standard without so much as a "by your leave." Are we truly free when these people can take our money and use it to finance an agenda of which we do not approve? Is it unpatriotic to state the facts?

At this point in time we are in a bad recession and a war simultaneously – Yet this recession would be over if government would stop stealing our income, and that the war would be over if we would start hitting the real targets. We are not living the dream the founders had for us – it has turned to a nightmare.

I’m supposed to unconditionally support the government whose school system teaches about homosexual perversion as natural but declines to teach American history. I didn’t make this up – it’s your government folks – I start complaining when you question my patriotism because I don’t support this kind of nonsense.

Thanks to Planned Parenthood, NOW, and other extremist hate groups, our society, encouraged by government muscle, slaughters over a million babies a year. Our schools have drugged over half, yes that’s half, of the male children that attend. The teacher’s unions, who just happen to own the Democratic Party, are a treasonous cultural Marxist organization and we have surrendered our children to their tender care.

We are often reminded that it is remiss to criticize government in time of war. What has government done with it’s freedom to strike at will?

In the Persian Gulf War we had the spectacle of US troops replacing the gold faucets on the Kuwaiti Royal Family’s bath tub while acting as security guards for George Bush I and his oil buddies but where was the threat to American security?

They lured the Kurdish resistance to Sadaam Hussein out in to the open with calls from Bush to "rise up against the tyrant." Bush then allowed Sadaam to slaughter them with his gunship helicopters. Meantime, we’re flying operations Iraq for violating the no-fly zone and have kept it up for ten years. It is just me? Can’t you see this is not only wrong but downright stupid?

Next stop Serbia where Christians were bombed to protect Islamic terrorists and drug dealers – people whom the government has characterized as our enemies and enemies of freedom it self. We still have soldiers in Yugoslavia protecting these bums as they purge Kosovo of Serbians – even though we supposedly went there originally because of the horrors of ethnic cleansing! All this murder and then it turns out there was no holocaust, no rape camps – it was all propaganda. I’m unpatriotic because I don’t fall for these shameful lies?

Our government has been playing patty cake with these terrorists for years. As of three months before nine one one they sent hundreds of millions of our money to the Taleban and have yet to be called on it. They are now bombing the heck out of that same Taleban without comment on the former support extended to them. It’s unpatriotic we’re told, to bring that up.

We at lewRockwell.com have never suggested that the perpetrators of nine one one should get anything but grief. Somehow though, I keep asking myself what bombing Kabul did to further that endeavor? We did after all know about the camps and caves where the Al Qaeda organization could be found. Isn’t the shortest distance between two points a straight line? Not here in never never land.

According to WorldNetDaily.com our willingness to placate our "ally" Pakistan may have allowed bin Laden to escape with hundreds if not thousands of his terrorist gangsters. We heard on TV that Pakistan pulled out it’s own nationals who were fighting for the Taliban in Afghanistan while the US unilaterally ceased fire. That’s weird enough for one war but wait there’s more: Al Qaeda may have taken full advantage of this cease fire to get out of Dodge but I’ll let you judge how true this is .

Our one "honest" politician, John McCain, explained on CNN that we had to fight expand the terror war and attack Sadaam Hussein or he would harm Israel. Excuse me, but since when is Israel a part of the United States?

I for one have supported Israel for a long time and that time is about over. Allies that involve us in constant warfare, such as England and Israel, are classic examples of silly Americans propping up socialist countries who want nothing more than to have us under their thumb. Their own cultures live on a thin edge since their socialist systems do not work without somebody to prop them up. Do you like supplying the cash and the shooters for a bunch of socialists? I don’t like it – not even a little bit.

We know with absolute surety that the WTC was taken down by Muslim extremists, mostly Saudis. Yet the "evidence" tape so widely touted by the government turns out to have been "doctored" to avoid embarrassing our Saudi "friends." They are not my friends so whom can they be talking about? And why are the thugs at the airport shaking down granny when they know damn well that seventy five year old white women have no terrorist connections?

Meantime, back at Propaganda Central we are deluged with pro-Muslim nonsense and horrified by having Ramadan celebrated at the White House. Did they ask you if we wanted to become a "multi-cultural" country or did they just decide unilaterally to destroy that nasty old Western European Christian heritage? A heritage by the way that has provided a safety net for minorities for several centuries.

Worldwide, where there are a lot of Muslims there is war and social disorder. And I wonder every day why my government has brought six million of them here to my country, where they are more apt to water down our existing culture than assimilate.

How about government support for the UN? Do the right wing conservatives who are clapping their hands each time new "smart" bomb film is released to the networks wonder why the government is selling our national sovereignty down the tubes to that bunch of clowns in their Halloween costumes? Our government pays most of the bills for an organization that wishes to destroy our sovereignty, and uses our money to do it.

Have you wondered why this government which you claim it is treason to oppose, has failed to defend your borders against one of the largest mass migrations in history? Or do you like having eight million illegal aliens living next door to you?

Do you wonder why George Bush has refused to investigate the crimes of the most despicable criminal to ever hold office, his predecessor?

The reason folks, is simple. The Republicans are up to their necks in it. It’s not about some individual – it is the apparatus. We have a huge government system staffed by people who have an agenda other than ours.

The Constitutional Republic has been stolen out from under us, and much of this conservative posturing is based on wishful thinking. I understand all too well how good it would feel to believe in the Republic again but pretending we are still the America of old is a form of denial. If we want America back we have a lot of work to do and we need to start thinking straight.

I accuse the American conservative movement of capitulating to the neo-cons and giving a despotic government a free pass to give our constitution the coup de grace and create the warfare state they have been longing for. Israel’s cause is now our cause – even though several hundred Israeli intelligence operatives are still being detained in the wake of the WTC attack – some of them arrested before 911 and some immediately after. Here is a link http://www.antiwar.com/justin/justincol.html.

So let me return to FreeRepublic.com and note that virtually every fact I’ve stated here has been stated there. Yet for some at least of the Freepers, there is a serious disconnect somewhere between getting the information and processing it. Some of those folks, and many conservatives nationwide, fail to draw the conclusions that are supported by the facts. We can not trust this government, we should not trust them, and we are running out of time where that will matter because there will be no recourse.

These same folks fuss about gun control – do they think Sadaam Hussein is the one imposing that upon us? Perhaps ATF is part of the "elite" Republican Guard about whom we once heard so much. Or was it those nasty Chinese? Did Osama Bin Laden frame an American citizen for a murder he did not commit – or was that the FBI?

That same FBI which conservatives wish to empower to work in even more secrecy is the one that did that. This violates common sense – it is down right pathological that any one could support those people.

I accuse American conservatives of shortsightedness, and of a lazy man’s approach to patriotism. Some of you seem to view the culture war as the media against us and our protector, George Bush. I should think by now you’d have worked through the connection between government and media. They share an agenda, they are implementing it and we are straining at gnats while swallowing some mighty big camels.

I accuse American conservatives of taking the easy way out – it’s fun to shout "Rah Rah" when the terrorists get a bomb on their heads – I like it myself. But to pretend that this government should get our unequivocal support is a dangerous fantasy. Just ask your child if he is allowed to mention the "C" word in his government school. You know – "Christmas?" Chances are he is not. That wasn’t some foreign aggressor who foisted the cultural Marxist agenda on our taxpayer-supported schools. Who is the real "enemy of freedom itself," if not those who are destroying it systematically?

I accuse Southern American conservatives of tolerating disrespect for your ancestors and your heritage, collaboration with a wicked and heathen occupier and abandoning your God given task of being the conscience of this Republic. If I am wrong – then explain to me why the flag of the Confederacy no longer flies in America? There was a time when even Northerners stood up for the flag, which as a shared memory had helped re-unite us after the War Between the States. Now the cultural cleansing is in full gear and our shame is that it has been successful.

I accuse conservative Christians of pursuing aims like the support of Israel and the Drug War which have hastened the collapse of our Republic. Blue Laws made it clear to everyone in America that you can pressure government to impose your will on other people. You have put social agenda ahead of the Gospel and your personal politics over the intent of the Republic. Time spent in pursuit of political goals from a pulpit is time stolen from Christ and His Gospel. Let the laymen handle it.

To the American soldiers who in the midst of all this insanity, are doing an ugly job that has to be done, I salute you all and wish you a Merry Christmas – and particularly Captain Larry and his Marines, and Major Kirk and his MPs. They are in Cuba and Kuwait respectively and they deserve better backup than they are getting from us. They are prepared to die for our freedom – shouldn’t we at least fight for it too, here on the home front?

To the enemies of freedom, and of Western Culture, I wish you confusion and despair, that you might see the error of your ways and we might be protected from the horrors you are unleashing upon us. I pray that God will fill you with His grace that you might have eyes to see and find true repentance and the joy of His salvation.

And finally, to the folks who murdered those people in New York – I hope that Santa comes down the chimney soon….

December 24, 2001


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last
To: tberry
Patriots or Traitors: That is the question
101 posted on 12/27/2001 5:56:50 AM PST by gnarledmaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
That's because LewRockwell is a bunch of Blame-America-First LEWsers.

Why are the people who question US foreign policy in the middle east called "The Blame America First Crowd," while the people who say that terrorist Afghanistan was created when the US left with the Russians are not? Sounds like they are blaming America as well. Isn't Afghanistan responsible for itself? Did we force them to set up a bunch of terrorist training camps? The "We Never Shoulda Left Afghanistan Argument" really smacks of some left wing/self hating/misdirected/specious/overcompassionate BS in my opinion, so it is really strange for me to hear "conservatives" repeat it so often. Aren't these the same people who always tell us we need an exit strategy. I guess the rules only fit when they need to.
102 posted on 12/27/2001 6:50:38 AM PST by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
Why are the people who question US foreign policy in the middle east called "The Blame America First Crowd," while the people who say that terrorist Afghanistan was created when the US left with the Russians are not?

Allow me to clarify: BOTH groups are B.A.F.ers. Anyone who blames America for terrorism inflicted on America is a BAFhole.

103 posted on 12/27/2001 6:54:14 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Allow me to clarify: BOTH groups are B.A.F.ers. Anyone who blames America for terrorism inflicted on America is a BAFhole

Ok. So now tell me how we get to justifying the terrorist attacks, from a simple criticism of US foreign policy. It seems to me that no one, except for terrorists, is saying that the US deserved the attack because of our mid east policy. I think they are merely saying that our policy puts us in their crosshairs. That is, we can either change our current policy, or continue the current policy with extra vigilence from now on. To me, they are just taking the path of least resistance. So call them lazy if you want. America haters, I think, is a little strong.
104 posted on 12/27/2001 7:16:57 AM PST by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
I think they are merely saying that our policy puts us in their crosshairs.

Guess what: Our existance puts us in their crosshairs. The fact we are prosperous puts us in their crosshairs. The fact we are (well, were) free puts us in their crosshairs. The fact we do not embrace Islam puts us in their crosshairs.

That is, we can either change our current policy, or continue the current policy with extra vigilence from now on. To me, they are just taking the path of least resistance. So call them lazy if you want.

I can agree with this. Lazy, and extremely short-sighted. Neville Chamberlain, watch out -- there's a new kid on the block.

America haters, I think, is a little strong.

Never called them that. I will, however, continue to call them Blame-America-First holes (BAFholes).

105 posted on 12/27/2001 7:26:08 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

Comment #106 Removed by Moderator

To: sixmil
Ok. So now tell me how we get to justifying the terrorist attacks, from a simple criticism of US foreign policy. It seems to me that no one, except for terrorists, is saying that the US deserved the attack because of our mid east policy.

You are correct, but you must remember you are arguing with party-line Republicans, not conservatives. This thread is very typical. Most negative responses are from posters who did not even read the article.

You are also correct in that no one other than the terrorists are saying we "deserved" the attacks. Our foreign policy is one of the main reasons for the attacks, not just the fact that the terrorists are Islamic. There are many, many other rich, industrialized quasi-capitalistic countries who should be in their "crosshairs" as well, but nothing has happened to them.

Its very scary to see Americans being divided over this. But, its probably a godsend for the totalitarian government thats just getting reved up. I had a bad feeling that once GW became president, there would be some issue arise or event happen that would allow the "masses" to label any "conservative" who disagrees with the official government position as a "extremist wacko". I could have never envisioned this, though. Now you have liberals and conservatives "brought together" by lies and deception ready to put anyone who disagrees with the countries new direction in front of a military tribunal. This couldn't have worked any better if it was planned....

107 posted on 12/27/2001 8:06:20 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Guess what: Our existance puts us in their crosshairs. The fact we are prosperous puts us in their crosshairs. The fact we are (well, were) free puts us in their crosshairs. The fact we do not embrace Islam puts us in their crosshairs.

When are the terrorist bombings scheduled to begin in Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Australia, Germany, Japan, Sweeden, Finland, Netherlands.......?

After all, they are all prosperous, somewhat free and don't embrace islam. They should have all been reduced to rubble by now. That Bin Laden guy must be slow or something.

108 posted on 12/27/2001 8:10:22 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
When are the terrorist bombings scheduled to begin in Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Australia, Germany, Japan, Sweeden, Finland, Netherlands.......?

Are you saying that Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Australia, Germany, Japan, Sweeden[sic], Finland, and the Netherlands are anywhere as prosperous as us? And are you saying that they are as prominent as us?

Russia was a contender, once, but they collapsed. We are the biggest boys in the block, and Bin Ladin et. al. are very jealous.

109 posted on 12/27/2001 8:13:34 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Are you saying that Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, Australia, Germany, Japan, Sweeden[sic], Finland, and the Netherlands are anywhere as prosperous as us?

The United States is not one of the top five richest countries in the world. Im not sure if we are even in the top ten. Our standard of living is also not in the top ten.

110 posted on 12/27/2001 9:00:49 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
The United States is not one of the top five richest countries in the world. Im not sure if we are even in the top ten. Our standard of living is also not in the top ten.

Gross Domestic Product, Billions of Dollars and Year of Survey (Repeated figures are figures from various compilations and sources):

Country bill$94 bill$95 bill$95 bill$94 bill$95 bill$96 bill$90 bill$90
Algeria 37 38 39          
Argentina 278 285 271          
Australia 324 332 342 332 352 373 326 339
Austria 221 226 231 161 166 172 172 176
Bangladesh 27 28 29          
Belgium 262 268 269 208 214 222 204 208
Brazil 610 626 657          
Bulgaria 37 38 38          
Canada 517 530 542 594 622 645 598 612
Chile 53 55 59          
China 2461 2523 2759          
Colombia 71 73 76          
Congo(Kin) 5 5 5          
Croatia 19 20 20          
Cuba 22 23 23          
Czech Rep 94 96 101       24 26
Denmark 173 178 170 106 112 118 139 142
Egypt 44 45 46          
El Salvador 9 9 10          
Ethiopia 5 5 5          
Finland 121 124 119 83 92 97 125 131
France 1452 1488 1521 1116 1157 1199 1234 1260
Germany 2079 2131 2172 1608 1675 1736 1750 1781
Ghana 6 6 6          
Greece 87 89 91 121 127 134 88 90
Hungary 64 65 66       31 32
India 299 307 326          
Indonesia 172 177 189          
Iran 158 162 158          
Iraq NA NA NA          
Ireland NA NA NA 57 62 69 54 61
Israel 83 85 91          
Italy 1025 1050 1082 1069 1115 1148 1124 1157
Japan 4981 5106 5153 2652 2752 2925 3144 3191
Kenya 7 7 8          
Korea, N 21 22 21          
Korea, S 380 390 425 507 565 619 334 364
Kuwait 28 28 30          
Luxembourg NA NA NA 12 13 14 13 13
Malaysia 71 73 81      
Mexico 254 261 237 728 698 751 302 283
Morocco 33 34 32      
Netherlands 373 382 391 289 307 325 308 315
New Zealand       58 61 64 48 50
Nigeria 94 96 95          
Norway 121 124 128 95 99 107 133 138
Pakistan 57 59 61          
Peru 51 53 57          
Philippines 71 73 77          
Poland 188 193 209       61 66
Portugal 98 100 103 119 124 130 71 72
Romania 91 93 99        
Russia 93 95 76          
Saudi Arabia 121 124 128          
Serbia-Montenegro NA NA 21          
Slovakia 18 19 19          
Slovenia 21 22 23          
South Africa 124 127 131          
Spain 525 538 554 538 561 587 515 529
Sri Lanka 12 12 13          
Sweden 207 212 219 155 166 171 226 235
Switzerland 302 309 316 170 177 181 226 228
Syria 45 46 50        
Taiwan 243 249 264          
Tanzania 4 4 4          
Thailand 147 151 163          
Turkey 153 157 167 320 350 383 165 176
United Kingdom 1058 1084 1110 1032 1047 1096 1013 1040
United States 6932 7106 7247 6716 7030 7388 6005 6147
Venezuela 71 73 75          

RANKING, IN ORDER:

  1. UNITED STATES
  2. JAPAN
  3. CHINA
  4. GERMANY
  5. FRANCE
  6. UNITED KINGDOM
  7. ITALY

Facts are stubborn things, aren't they?

111 posted on 12/27/2001 9:16:50 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
The United States is not one of the top five richest countries in the world. Im not sure if we are even in the top ten. Our standard of living is also not in the top ten.

Are you joking? What is your source for that assertion?

112 posted on 12/27/2001 9:21:25 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
GDP is not how "richness" is computed. I should have been more specific. Average household income is what I mean when I say "richest" country.
113 posted on 12/27/2001 9:23:07 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
Are you joking? What is your source for that assertion?

Sorry if you guys don't know the truth. This is common knowledge - its widely reported. As of 1996, we were (I think) 5th in Standard of living. As I corrected myself in my post to Lazamataz, the U.S. is not in the top five in average household income, which is what I meant by "richest".

114 posted on 12/27/2001 9:26:58 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
GDP is not how "richness" is computed. I should have been more specific. Average household income is what I mean when I say "richest" country.

We have the greatest 'critical mass' of wealth in the world. We are envied and hated for it.

115 posted on 12/27/2001 9:27:22 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: tberry

Good article! But this guy has issues, and the only big issue I have is with political correctness. However, I think his article has merit.

116 posted on 12/27/2001 10:04:29 AM PST by Colt .45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Facts are stubborn things, aren't they?

Not if you dig a little deeper than the surface.

Your list is a little dated, and also it is nothing more than GNP, which is basically a guage of how big a country's economy is. I think you should give some weight to per capita GNP, which factors out population size. Another one is PPP (purchasing power parity) which takes cost of living into account.

These are from the CIA World factbook 2001 (1999 data):

GDP
1. US
2. China (chicom notorious for overstating gdp)
3. Japan
4. Germany
5. India
6. France
7. UK
8. Italy
9. Brazil
10. Mexico

Per Capita GNP
1. Luxembourg
2. US
3. Singapore
4. Switzerland
5. Monaco
6. Norway
7. Belgium
8. Denmark
9. Iceland
10. Japan/Austria

PPP you'll have to get from World Bank or somewhere, but I can tell you that the US does well, while northern European countries and Japan tend to slide down the scale for the simple fact that collectivism ain't cheap.

But getting back to the original point, do you have any reason to doubt the reasons the terrorists themselves give for attacking America? I don't know that I would take out all of Mecca, but I certainly would not be happy with Saudi (or even UN) troops on our soil to protect us from a Canadian invasion, for example.
117 posted on 12/27/2001 1:05:38 PM PST by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
You've posted facts basically supporting my position, and I thank you for it.

But getting back to the original point, do you have any reason to doubt the reasons the terrorists themselves give for attacking America?

Simple: Palestinians claimed they would be peaceful if only Israel would make all these major concessions.

Israel made most of those major concessions.

Palestine began one of its most bloody terrorist attack periods.

Terrorists lie.

118 posted on 12/27/2001 1:09:52 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
You've posted facts basically supporting my position, and I thank you for it.

Simple: Palestinians claimed they would be peaceful if only Israel would make all these major concessions.

Israel made most of those major concessions.

Palestine began one of its most bloody terrorist attack periods.

Terrorists lie.

------

My point is not that we can get these terrorists off of our backs by meeting their demands. No way. Negotiating with terrorists encourages terrorism just as appeasement encourages aggression. We must completely destroy them now without remorse or hesitation. My guess is that we could have avoided this. I am a firm believer that lying with dogs gets you fleas everytime. Too bad we can not go back in a time machine to see if I really am right. I look at our troops in Korea and I know that they are, in general, not welcome there. If a country can not even appreciate our help, then why should we be there? What is in it for us? Why is it our job to police the world and then get little more than spite in return?
119 posted on 12/27/2001 1:49:37 PM PST by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
My guess is that we could have avoided this. I am a firm believer that lying with dogs gets you fleas everytime.

Unfortunately, the whole damned world is flea-ridden, even Canada, and even the US. So you have to be willing to embrace isolationism to be flea-free, and if you think isolationism works between nations, consider: If you completely isolate a town, it's economy will crumble. It is the same with a nation.

120 posted on 12/27/2001 1:54:35 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson