Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wiley Sr
Were all Pharisees hypocrites? Weren't Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus both Pharisees? Seems they were both 'good guys." The Talmud claims that there were seven classes of Pharisee and only one acted out of love.

Was it not the Sadducees that were mostly responsible for Christ's death? They were significant as part of the ruling Sanhedrin authority at the time and the major influence in the Sanhedrin. Caiaphas, the chief priest of the Sanhedrin was a Sadduccee.

"The polemical utterances in the Gospels...created the image of the Pharisees as religious hypocrites--an image from which only modern research has freed them." Encylopaedia Brittanica. So who do we believe in this matter?

15 posted on 12/25/2001 12:12:48 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paulus Invictus
Paul, when he was Saul and persecuted the church, was a Pharisee. The Sadducees lacked a belief in an afterlife, and were a smaller group than the Pharisees, who did believe in a life after death. The two groups comprised the religious elite of the land, and both would have been pushing Pilate to get on with the show.

As for who is "mostly responsible for Christ's death", I suppose it depends on your understanding of Christian theology. Christ has some harsh words for Peter when he tries to prevent it. Paul says we would all be most unfortunate if it hadn't occurred. Christ's death is necessary, so I don't know if blame is really an appropriate consideration.

65 posted on 12/29/2001 12:08:05 AM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson