[bigcheese]

Hmmm.... yeah, C# is supposed to be the "shake hands and make up" language for all the VBer's who have complained about VB not be completely compiled in native code, and the VCer's who have not wanted VBer's to be compiled into native code (speed advantage). So a mix of VB and VC++. Fine and dandy, it seems to me. But I still havent quite grasped what is supposed to be so revolutionary about the .Net platform, other then more OO oriented (I just like to show my O face ;-) and the ability to deliver your apps across the web. Am I missing something?

[tacticalogic]

Not sure. I'm more of a core OS guy, and the basic OS kernel and architecture is virtually unchanged from 2K to XP/.Net, so I haven't invested a lot of time in looking at the differences yet.