Allow me to quote myself:
You state that the clause in question has to do with amending the Constitution. I was wondering: did you reach that conclusion from the location of the clause in Article V...? Does the location of the clause have significance? Does the clause apply exclusively to Article V concerns (constitutional amendment)?
I count three questions. Each is quite simple. Care to answer any of them or not? After all, I am only inquiring with regard to your opinion...
;>)
I guess it did to H.Askton --- he's the one who quoted a line from Article V and said it allowed secession. I simply responded, and asked him to show me where it did that. Do you agree with him?