But the transfer of portions of sovereignty were expressed and limited, not unlimited, nor was it intended to be necessarilly perpetual. Anyone who considers the whole record will not accept your skewed, prejudiced and factually incorrect position.
Your attempts to pervert perception of these events always puts me in mind of what Jefferson said:
"We are all Republicans--we are all Federalists. If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is free to combat it." March 4, 1801 An appeal to reason will show your posts for the disinformation campaign that they are.
Let me guess, is John Galt "a hate-filled shill for slavers," too?
Respecfully,
D J White
As long as he deliberately misrepresents the words of the 10th amendment, the answer has to be yes.
Walt