Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leesylvanian
I stopped responding to WP's crap last week when he tried to imply that I was lying about whether I had ever read Martin v. Hunter's Lessee while in college.

I didn't -imply- anything. You're lying. I stated plainly that you've lied.

You lie in this post too. Chief Justice Jay clearly states in his ruling on Chisholm that the states -transferred- certain elements of sovereignty to the federal government. The states retain -other- elements of sovereignty. It is wrong to say that I -ever- said that the states were not sovereign, or that the ruling says that.

So you are caught again in unclever deception, and flat lies.

Walt

339 posted on 01/02/2002 9:15:51 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
It is wrong to say that I -ever- said that the states were not sovereign

Well which is it? Either the states are sovereign on everything except what is covered in the Constitution or they aren't.

342 posted on 01/02/2002 9:38:54 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson