Replies

You appear to be the first poster to have actually read and commented on the article itself as opposed to commenting on the author or publication source. Thank you! I was hoping readers would get past the source and author and actually read the article, but I knew some would just dismiss it and go off on tangents.

Merry Christmas, Proud2BAmerican!

I was hoping readers would get past the source and author and actually read the article, but I knew some would just dismiss it and go off on tangents.

This whole article is a question of the wisdom of the Vatican's prudential judgements. It is completely subjective. It simply cannet be objectively debated. Furthermore, I personally do not think this can be debated with charity in such a forum as this, thus my own tangent. This is dangerous ground, and it could very well give public scandal.

Are All Catholic Laymen and Non-Theologians Qualified to Freely and Frequently Criticize the Pope's Opinions and Prudential Judgment?

Laymen Advising and Rebuking Popes