[madrussian]

I prefer acting on facts and in America's interests, simply put. Facts aren't there, and you can spot bullshit for what it is.

As for weapons of mass destruction, Pakistan, that supported the Taliban, has them. Israel has them and is not shy to threaten their use, both against all Arabs and any other country they may suspect of "not helping them enough".

As for Iraq, they are one of the most secular countries there. They have regional ambitions, who doesn't?

[OKCSubmariner]

From reply #17 madrussian wrote in response to my question to him about what should be done about Iraq and Saddam's weapons of mass destruction (reply #14):

"As for Iraq, they are one of the most secular countries there. They have regional ambitions, who doesn't?"

Should I take this to mean that you believe nothing should be done about Iraq and Saddam and his weapons of mass destruction.?

When you say "who doesn't have regional ambitions " are you including Russia ?

Russia and Putin I noticed warned the US recently not to take any action against the Russian client state of Iraq.