True. I simply contend that the absence of a given government policy or action is as much a statement of social ideology as the presence of the same would be.
For example, the anti-marriage crowd, Gloria Steinem et al, oppose the fast-tracking of the elimination of the "marriage penalty" in the tax code. Fast tracking it would be an action reflecting a social ideology; same goes for advocating the absence of that action.
Other Libertarians seem to feel that the absence of an action is always nonideological: this perspective. I contend.