Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElkGroveDan
But "in order to get heard, to be heard by elected officials, money doesn't hurt," she said. "I give money to leadership in Washington, D.C., -- and I've done it here in California, to people I hope will move the agenda for children. "

This "agenda for children" really makes me angry. WHAT agenda for children? Liberals think that as long as they say "for the children" they can get away with anything.

This agenda Riordan and his wife have for children includes abortions without parental consent (or knowledge); contraceptives for 13 year olds (without parental consent); teaching homosexuality in public schools (it's happening all over the state, and has the biggest programs in Riordan's L.A.) and other radical, anti-family initiatives.

Riordan once said that "If it's for the children, I'm for it." I say to you: not everything that is "for the children" is good for children. Just turn on the television and look at the children's programs!

Riordan is too liberal for Republicans, and, frankly, as liberal as the most liberal Democrats. He's too liberal for California, and definitely too liberal for me.

11 posted on 12/22/2001 9:11:21 AM PST by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Gophack
YOU AIN'T NO HACK......BUMP !!
12 posted on 12/22/2001 9:22:43 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson