Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
And, Mr. TP, a brief dictionary or encyclopedia reference is entirely inadequate to the task of sorting out the parties by moral principles.

It's because the Libertarian Party doesn't have any that you would even think to do so.

End of story!

122 posted on 01/09/2002 3:46:03 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
You are 'Whigged' out. There is no comparison between the parties, that I could find. The only mention of a platform or principle behind the party was from a short dictionary type article:

The American Whig Party (roughly from 1834-1856) The Whig Party, in the United States, was for most of its history concerned with promoting internal improvements, such as roads, canals, railroads, deepening of rivers, etc. This was of interest to many Westerners in this period, isolated as they were and in need of markets. Abraham Lincoln was a Whig for most of this period.

Go join VA in the alumafoil section of FR. 120 posted by tpaine

And, Mr. TP, a brief dictionary or encyclopedia reference is entirely inadequate to the task of sorting out the parties by moral principles.

Hello? -- Did I say it was? -- YOU claimed they were comparable. You can't back up your BS.

It's because the Libertarian Party doesn't have any that you would even think to do so.

-- Dozens of entire FR threads are composed of arguments on libertarian principles. You deny reality.

End of story!

And, an end to your credibility.

123 posted on 01/09/2002 5:07:17 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson