Question for you -- the flight profile of a Phoenix, as I understand it, is to fly very high above an approaching aircraft and plummet down on it at very high speed and frag with a wide lethality cone, whereas the Slammer is more hunt-you-and-kill-you, and can be physically evaded and defeated. Why do you think the Phoenix in actual use is easier (for a missile carrying platform)to evade?
Question for you -- the flight profile of a Phoenix, as I understand it, is to fly very high above an approaching aircraft and plummet down on it at very high speed and frag with a wide lethality cone, whereas the Slammer is more hunt-you-and-kill-you, and can be physically evaded and defeated. Why do you think the Phoenix in actual use is easier (for a missile carrying platform)to evade?
Several problems: the radar is not LPI, so any fighter being attacked is going to have LOTS of warning. Second, it's a very large light-colored object against a dark background. Third, that high speed DOES limit its maneuverability. Fourth, and this is the really bad part, if the bogey manages to generate between 60 and 90 degrees of turn, his fighter will effectively disappear--because the bogey's Doppler will disappear. A bomber can't do it; a loaded fighter still can.
My objection to the Phoenix is in the dogfight role, not for splashing heavy bombers.