Check that date. I don't need the Republican "facts". I have the real ones.
Posted on 12/21/2001 4:56:18 AM PST by vrwc54
WASHINGTON – The mountains of Tora Bora remind me of giant anthills. On the surface, arid soil. Underneath, a maze of tunnels, in which al-Qaida fighters scurry around like angry soldier ants, defending the queen from invading forces.But the queen, Osama bin Laden, has escaped the nest and may live long enough to recolonize and spawn new anti-American terrorist cells.
If we don't find bin Laden soon – and chances are slim that we will, since we don't have a clue where he is right now – blame our commander in chief and his politically correct war.
As I opined in this space Nov. 7, President Bush chewed up the precious first three weeks of the war courting and dining Muslims.
That worked swell: They stole and poisoned our food; aided and abetted the Taliban; burned Uncle Sam in effigy; aired bin Laden propaganda videos; and refused to let us use their air bases. They even named their babies Osama.
Meanwhile, their hero found better places to hide.
Phase 2 enlisted Muslim surrogates to fight our war for us. That worked great, too. After taking the booty, they let our enemy – but apparently not really theirs – escape to Pakistan, along with his commanders. The Taliban leader, Mohammed Omar, also got a pass, after we foolishly let alliance leaders negotiate the terms of his surrender. Those terms included a new hideout and some 400 bodyguards.
Now we're entering Phase 3: Manhunt for the escapees. Only, American "infidels" won't be doing the hunting, and certainly not the killing. Since the quarry is hiding in another Muslim country, we'll rely again on Muslim surrogates to bag it.
Don't hold your breath. Many Pakistanis revere bin Laden and would jump at the chance to shelter him. And the same Paki military and intelligence agency that's supposed to be sealing off the border and finding escapees for us is largely pro-Taliban.
No matter. The ticker-tape parade is probably still in the works, same route as the Gulf war celebration. Another Mideast "victory" prematurely declared.
Face it, the Bushes, who have Arab oil interests, are the wrong people to be winning – I mean, really winning – Arab wars (and don't think Daddy's not in the loop this go-round). Being guilty rich white patricians, they're also petrified of being called bigots, thus the hypersensitivity to Muslims the world over.
Oh, I can hear the jeers now from the Bush cheerleading section: You're a jerk, Sperry, a naysayer, just like the rest of the liberal media. The Taliban used to control about 90 percent of Afghanistan. Now they're on the run. Dubya kicked butt!
Reality check: Scattering does not mean defeating. And on the run does not mean dead, or imprisoned, and not able to terrorize Americans ever again. Recall that Bushies also declared victory when Iraqi troops ran back to Baghdad. Ten years later, we're still talking about sacking Baghdad. Some victory.
The original goal of the war on terrorism was simply to kill the terrorists who killed us. Bushies are gloating over accomplishing a goal that was made up along the way. It never was about liberating Afghanistan and propping up a new form of government there – unless, that is, Bush and a certain Arab-American security adviser of his still have a secret interest in building an oil pipeline across Afghanistan. If you can find such an objective in Bush's speech to Congress, let me know. Otherwise, the administration is guilty of mission creep before even finishing the core mission.
As long as bin Laden and Omar remain at large and can issue fatwahs, we are still in danger. Until you see them dead or behind bars, hold the ticker tape.
As it stands now, all we've done is taken a stick and stirred up a big anthill halfway around the world, without killing the queen. We've killed a lot of worker ants, yes, but we've merely scattered their leaders. These terrorists are nomads. Pushing them out of Kabul hardly fazed them. Like ants, they can recolonize practically overnight.
If we don't let our own troops exterminate them – on the ground rather than from the air – they will recolonize; and like stirred-up red ants, they will be angrier than ever at the "Great Satan" and "infidel invaders."
So far, largely for political reasons, we haven't let our special forces do the exterminating, even though they've trained for this for years.
A reconnaissance specialist who just returned from Afghanistan told me that special ops aren't doing much more than tagging along with alliance forces and calling in bombing coordinates for them.
Mr. President, stop subcontracting out America's war. Set U.S. forces loose on those remaining unsearched Afghanistan caves and redoubts that may be sheltering Omar. And deploy them to those Pakistan border towns that may be harboring bin Laden.
NO LEFTIES ALLOWED!
But, since they're Republicans, it doesn't matter.
Sure, this would not be a satisfactory "end result"- the only reason anyone would use that standard is to keep the pressure on for more action.
That's fine with me, and the rest of America.
Sperry is clueless on this one. The administration is saying this thing is only beginning and they are right.
Check that date. I don't need the Republican "facts". I have the real ones.
I have never seen anyone in this administration claim victory yet. It is much too soon for any criticism of the war results.
It would be nice if your "real" facts included such tidbits as the tax rebate plan being a Democrat demand that Bush agreed to and that the tax cuts Bush advocated haven't taken effect yet.
And since housing starts and the stock market are on the rise again, I'd wonder about the accuracy of the "no end in sight" of that headline.
Un PC, your continued use of that 4,000 innocent civilians figure reveals your lying Lefty agenda. You have been outed, Chimpster.
I thought you Dems liked spending money? Last time I checked, Bush and the Republicans were trying to cut as much spending as possible while the Democrats keep piling it on to "stimulus" bills that should include tax cuts only.
Take your lies elsewhere -- and be a good lefty and carpool with MurryMom, please.
Why do you lefties always insist on obfuscating?
stag·nant (stgnnt) adj.
2.Foul or stale from standing: stagnant ponds.
3. a.Showing little or no sign of activity or advancement; not developing or progressing; inactive: a stagnant economy.
b.Lacking vitality or briskness; sluggish or dull: a stagnant mind.
Or do you deny the downturn in the economy began while Clinton was in office?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.