That's a second hand allegation of fact.
You know how to provide the readers with quotes from witness reports and the supporting reference source URL's for the quotes.
In short, let's all see the witness reports you're supposedly relying on along with your quotes specifiying precisely what you're supposedly relying on in each of them.
It's kind of comical that you yourself insist on URLs for each statement, when the NTSB for years withheld the witness evidence entirely, even though they are required by law to release it.
Here's a witness statement that says the explosion was "white" first, and then an orange fireball. Why white first? Interview. I have an explanation. Do you?