Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
The vote was split--Chase favoring laying aside the indictment, and Underwood, who had overseen the grand juries responsible for the indictment, wanting the case to be tried

Former Secretary of the Treasury Chase laying aside the indictment. Well Non, you know what I have to say about that and human nature proves it. Chase could convict a dead man, but this case and Texas v.White were a little too close to laying blame on others and we know that he couldn't do that

31 posted on 12/21/2001 5:35:30 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: billbears
Yeah, billbears, I know how you view Supreme Court decisions. Those you agree with are valid and those you don't agree with are tainted. But Chase did Davis a favor and you know it. Had Davis been tried he would have been convicted. The government would have picked a jury that would have guaranteed that.
36 posted on 12/21/2001 5:53:49 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson