Skip to comments.
The innocent dead in a coward's war
The Guardian ^
| Thursday December 20, 2001
| Seumas Milne
Posted on 12/20/2001 9:11:09 AM PST by afuturegovernor
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: afuturegovernor
But what has been cruelly demonstrated is that the US and its camp followers are prepared to sacrifice thousands of innocents in a coward's war. LOL!!! The more we wins, the bitterer they gets.
2
posted on
12/20/2001 9:16:56 AM PST
by
wideawake
To: afuturegovernor
Now, for the first time, a systematic independent study has been carried out into civilian casualties in Afghanistan by Marc Herold, a US economics professor at the University of New Hampshire. Based on corroborated reports from aid agencies, the UN, eyewitnesses, TV stations, newspapers and news agencies around the world, Herold estimates that at least 3,767 civilians were killed by US bombs between October 7 and December 10. That is an average of 62 innocent deaths a day - and an even higher figure than the 3,234 now thought to have been killed in New York and Washington on September 11. So an ECONOMICS PROFESSOR who is an EXPERT in ECONIOMICS collected UNSUBSTANUATED reports from HIGHLY UNRELIABLE SOURCES to come up with definative death count, that is still only an ESTIMATE! Wonder if this goober was also used by the Democraps to calculate the number of black disenfranchised Florida voters! Call Jeff Cohn from F.A.I.R. This is the kind of crap he uses to back up acurate reporting by liberals!
3
posted on
12/20/2001 9:17:54 AM PST
by
Bommer
To: afuturegovernor
Based on corroborated reports from aid agencies, the UN, eyewitnesses, TV stations, newspapers and news agencies around the world, Herold estimates that at least 3,767 civilians were killed by US bombs Why do I think this number was arrived at via: Hmmm
lets see. ABC says 2 were killed, CBS has it at 3, NBC has 2, CNN 4, the Taliban claims 28. 2+3+2+4+28 is 39! 39 innocent civilians were killed yesterday.
To: afuturegovernor
A quick check of the web shows that Professor Herold is involved in various peacenik groups and thus has a bit of an axe to grind.
He uses newspapers as his sources for his estimates, but the reality is that just about all the estimates were either directly from Taliban sources or hearsay from relief people who talked to Taliban sources.
So, basically, it's Taliban garbage in and Taliban garbage out. And 62 civilian deaths per day actually would represent a mellowing of the Taliban regime.
Quaker Website that mentions the prof prior to his study
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: afuturegovernor
Putting it simply, Herold's figures are highly suspect.
7
posted on
12/20/2001 9:21:54 AM PST
by
tallhappy
To: Bommer
Good Comments He He He .........
Stay Safe and have a great Christmas
8
posted on
12/20/2001 9:22:29 AM PST
by
Squantos
To: Bommer
Marc Herold is Associate Professor of Economic Development & Women's Studies at the powerhouse University of New Hampshire. A Berkeley graduate, he lists his interests as: Third World Development, Women and Development, Multinational Enterprises, Postmodernism, and Development Philosophy.
Sounds like a really credible authority for civilian casualties in the US bombing campaign, eh?
To: afuturegovernor
We learned from the Vietnam war. Liberals don't like body counts.
To: afuturegovernor
It has instead been paid by ordinary Afghans, who had nothing whatever to do with the atrocities, didn't elect the Taliban theocrats who ruled over them and had no say in the decision to give house room to Bin Laden and his friends.
It is hard to imagine being so divorced from reality as this Seumas Milne fellow and the Guardian.
Milne seems to to be totally unaware that culturally and morally, the Afghans are as different from westerners as martians.
Their culture and their morality where it comes to the value of human life makes it absurd to talk about them as if they were the neighbors down the block.
They are brutal on the family level and it escalates from there.
They "feared" (and respected) the Taliban more that they feared us.
And they paid they price; They actually judged us as erroneously as Milne judges them. And saw the result of our anger as ordinary as another primitive tribe's.
Big mistake. And lesson not yet learned. They are actually negotiating away the leaders of the Al Qaeda for money!
Innocent? I don't think so.
Debt paid? Not even close...
To: afuturegovernor
Shouldnt there be a barf alert?This guy is a liberal peacenik with some kind of agenda,Ive read his stuff before.People die in war,its too bad,but its war.Perhaps he should be asked about all the innocent Germans killed in Dresden and Cologne by British bombers.Or the Argentines for that matter.Jeez,I guess libs are everywhere.
To: Publius6961
It has instead been paid by ordinary Afghans, who had nothing whatever to do with the atrocities, didn't elect the Taliban theocrats who ruled over them and had no say in the decision to give house room to Bin Laden and his friends. Gee, the colonists didn't elect the British Empire and took care of business themselves in 1776.
13
posted on
12/20/2001 9:41:58 AM PST
by
zandtar
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: afuturegovernor
Gee, where was Marc Herold and all of this "concern" about innocents when the Taliban slaughtered 8,000 during their reign, in addition to the other atrocities they've commited upon the civilians?
15
posted on
12/20/2001 9:45:26 AM PST
by
zandtar
To: afuturegovernor
.... but because of the low value put on Afghan civilian lives by US military planners. .... and their campfollowers ....as is being demonstrated on this thread.
Seems most of the posters here are merely disappointed that more were not killed or maimed. If God is 'on the side of' bloodthirsty barbarians who revel in, or attempt to disparage ANY spilling of innocent blood, I want no part of this 'god' they worship.
Meanwhile, as grief walks the frozen hills of Afghanistan, OBL or whomever was responsible for 9/11 walks free.
To: Clinton's a rapist
I don't think that word "independent" means what they think it means.
To: afuturegovernor
Now, for the first time, a systematic independent study has been carried out into civilian casualties in Afghanistan by Marc Herold, a US economics professor at the University of New Hampshire.
I found that once I lost all credibility, I became independant
18
posted on
12/20/2001 9:50:42 AM PST
by
sheep
To: zandtar
Yes. For just one example, the Taliban shelled Kabul for a month in June 1996, killing (stable estimates say)more than 2000. Where the hell was the Guardian then?
19
posted on
12/20/2001 9:52:40 AM PST
by
PPCLI
To: afuturegovernor; all
20
posted on
12/20/2001 9:57:17 AM PST
by
dighton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson