Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exmarine
The Confederacy would have been over in a matter of months without its army, the members of which were almost overwhelmngly driven by an urge to drive out the invaders. Now, I believe the North should not have issued a call for arms and escalate to war as it did, but rather work things out peacefully, with some concesions to the South such as Sumter. We can argue all day whether this was possible; I think it was, but perhaps it wasn't. At any rate war passions ran high and the North and South paid dear for it in blood.
176 posted on 12/21/2001 10:22:07 AM PST by Cleburne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: Cleburne
The Confederacy would have been over in a matter of months without its army, the members of which were almost overwhelmngly driven by an urge to drive out the invaders.

Which urge waned pretty quicky and the Richmond government had to resort to conscription in April, 1862--because there was little enthusiasm for re-elistment.

Walt

179 posted on 12/21/2001 10:55:26 AM PST by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

To: Cleburne
The Confederacy would have been over in a matter of months without its army, the members of which were almost overwhelmngly driven by an urge to drive out the invaders.

The members of which were almost 30% draftees. And a large percentage of the remainder were forced to remain in past their original enlistment. But I'm sure that those who were left no doubt were driven by an urge to drive out the invaders.

206 posted on 12/21/2001 1:13:10 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson