Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
"Citizens -- not activists -- who object to all or part of a development plan are at a huge disadvantage."

Call them what you want; I call them NIMBY activists because that's what they are. - What they are doing is immoral, and unreasonable. - If they wish to influence the use of property, then they are morally obligated to purchase that property. - Nobody has a right to encumber the property of another so that they can use it to further their own enjoyment.

60 posted on 12/20/2001 12:54:21 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
Nobody has a right to encumber the property of another so that they can use it to further their own enjoyment.

True, true. Of course, these developments often impose significant costs -- monetary and otherwise -- on others. As a result, those affected have every right to seek whatever encumbrances are necessary to minimize those costs.

61 posted on 12/20/2001 1:41:38 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson