Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brityank
"It's not right," Casale said. "Why should one half of the town be under this jurisdiction while the other side of town is not? It's a land-taking, and the thing that has us really up in arms is, they tried to push it through in a covert manner."

I wonder who owns property in the half of town that is not restricted and then compare it to the list of people who are behind the effort to take away the property rights of others.

Strikes me as being suspect, just like the fact that members of the Sierra Club are much more likely to have red wood decks than the average person. Then there was the president of the local chapter of the Sierra Club in the Spokane, WA, area many years ago who illegaly logged 20 acres of his own property but saw nothing wrong with that. Like all liberals, their rules only apply to others.

50 posted on 12/20/2001 11:53:48 AM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: connectthedots; Aquinasfan
Af -- meet CtD.

Maybe you (Af) ought to visit the county records and do a little digging.

There is more truth than you think to the eco-terrorists position. I recall seeing a story about a luxury retreat built in one of the western preserves that had been made off-limits to Citizens; seems you could only get there by helicopter, and they used it as a 'premium' to award their backers.

64 posted on 12/20/2001 2:13:19 PM PST by brityank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson