Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[MA] Landowners Take On State
The Sierra Times ^ | 6 December, 2001 | Boston Globe via Sierra Times

Posted on 12/20/2001 3:20:36 AM PST by brityank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: editor-surveyor
Agree- I absolutely despise these incestuous little groups who want to use the force of the government to make others do as they wish.
21 posted on 12/20/2001 9:47:40 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
"SMART GROWTH" = Liberalism's new term to redistribute wealth and population from the Republican controlled suburbs to the Democrat controlled cities. Smart Growth is a bad word.
22 posted on 12/20/2001 9:49:42 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: brityank; CheneyChick; vikingchick; Victoria Delsoul; WIMom; susangirl; coteblanche...
Oh, my heart is just freeping bleeding to pieces for Massachusetts and the rest of the good-for-nothing postage stamp states of New England.

These parcels of pompousity wouldn't even make a decent county out West, yet they keep sending up a dozen self-congratulatory senators (and hardly more congressmen) who think nothing of the federal hording of 60% of the land west of the Mississippi.

Once we're done grabbing 60% of the land from Connecticut to Maine, I vote we export enough California colonistas to increase the population on the remaining land there by 10% to 20%.

This article has put a vicious, vengeful grin on this Californian's face. If New England doesn't like it, then they can go clean their own house, so that we'll finally be able to clean ours.


23 posted on 12/20/2001 9:51:31 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; ThanksBTTT; carry-okie
Bump!
24 posted on 12/20/2001 9:54:23 AM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
What you posted is great!: ""SMART GROWTH" = Liberalism's new term to redistribute wealth and population from the Republican controlled suburbs to the Democrat controlled cities. Smart Growth is a bad word."

Very insightful, Old Pro!

25 posted on 12/20/2001 9:54:35 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
My thoughts exactly. Thanks for the bump and article.
26 posted on 12/20/2001 9:57:01 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
The word hasn't gotten out to the Boston Globe yet but

The Enviro-wackos are committing scientific fraud

: [LYNX HOAX] Wilderness Institute Calls Federal Action Against Scientific Fraud By ESA Officials
and all their studies need to be reviewed.
27 posted on 12/20/2001 10:03:33 AM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Elitist B!tch!

Nazi Elitist b!tch.

Stay well - stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

28 posted on 12/20/2001 10:11:12 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
As for your idea of taking 60% of the land from CT through Maine and relocating a whole buch of Left Coast wackos to the ther Left Coast here in New England it s*cks. What we have here is the putification of these original cradels of Liberty into a miasmic cesspool of statists in control. The number of senators these small states have is a left over from the original ratification of our Constitution and the only part not subject to change by amendment. get used to it. Now if you would care to guarantee that all these new residents would be of the same character as say you or Travis McGee we would have a resotation of our rights up here.

The fact is the Liberals from CT, MA, RI, and VT are a scourage on this land. Yes, they control the politics here that does not mean everyone from New England wants to see the war on the West continue or to have been waged at all.

I suggest you calm down. i in some ways enjoy seeing many of those who have quietly gone along in Liberal Land getting gored by this ox.

Stay well - stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

29 posted on 12/20/2001 10:19:54 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
"can they continue to be good stewards? Not with the development pressures you have in this region. We can't be certain of the future. It's necessary to have this kind of review to protect these resources."

If we pick this one apart, we can see that there really is a problem lurking in here, which neither side really wants us to discuss.

First off, you can kind of see her point. It is a plain fact that suburban housing developments completely destroy wildlife habitat. Just about any development you care to name has the following characteristics: close-packed (and ugly) houses, fenced yards, plenty of concrete, and no space for wildlife. When one lives near such a development, it's common to see all sorts of unexpected wildlife in the yard -- or dead alongside the road -- as the animals are pushed out by construction. This represents a real loss to a community.

Digging deeper, one can find a couple of agendas at work here.

On the one hand, the anti-development crowd commonly resorts to this back-door method of finding an obscure little beast as a means of bringing the weight of the Federal government to bear on their behalf. This prevents an honest and necessary discussion for finding a balance between home-building and preservation of wildlife habitat -- both of which are needed and desirable.

On the other hand, the developers' interests are often at odds with the rest of the community. Mutually satisfactory outcomes are rare: it's almost impossible for members of the community to influence developers once they've got it in their minds to build. Unlike normal citizens, developers have virtually unlimited resources, and large staffs of lobbyists and lawyers who can devote all of their time, efforts -- and campaign contributions -- toward total victory. Eventually the normal citizens will miss a meeting, and then they're toast.

Just as with the environmentalists, the developers work hard to avoid necessary discussion on homes vs. wildlife. In addition, the developers work hard to mask the fact that their handiwork inevitably leads to real and significant monetary costs to the community, including additional traffic, roads, drainage, water supplies, and fire and police coverage -- not to mention the intangible losses such as added noise, pollution, crowding, and the fact that the developments seem to be designed to encourage a transient, non-neighborly lifestyle.

Which brings us to the real problem: people like us -- the ones in the middle -- end up paying the price imposed by both sides of this battle, and we really haven't got much choice other than to pick which group to which we'll surrender.

30 posted on 12/20/2001 10:24:28 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Who may nominate and elgibility features
31 posted on 12/20/2001 10:25:18 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
B.S.
I see you know male bovine dung when you see it too.
Understanding, with dawning clarity, is slowly coming to much of the ignorant masses attention. snicker...ignorant masses...Massachusetts
32 posted on 12/20/2001 10:26:59 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; editor-surveyor
If New England doesn't like it, then they can go clean their own house, so that we'll finally be able to clean ours.

Here, here!!! hehehe.


33 posted on 12/20/2001 10:31:09 AM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Massachusetts...America's dilema in microcosm.
Should they start enforcing or restricting immigration standards?
34 posted on 12/20/2001 10:32:05 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Here, here!!! hehehe.
LOL
What a play on words you have there.
35 posted on 12/20/2001 10:34:20 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: brityank
Hopkinton is my home town, I have relatives in Grafton and Upton.
Bump for later read
36 posted on 12/20/2001 10:39:37 AM PST by The Mayor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan;brityank;1oldpro
Here is a well-documented resource for educating people of the logical fallacies, unintended consequences, and environmental damage caused by Smart Growth (Agenda21) in Portland, Oregon.
37 posted on 12/20/2001 10:41:57 AM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
A bump for a fellow author, to whom I owe a favor.


38 posted on 12/20/2001 10:45:03 AM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Thanks, that's worth saving
39 posted on 12/20/2001 10:46:08 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: brityank
"Property Rights is not just a Western Problem."

That's a good point Brity...we westerners tend to think this is only happening in the west but some of the most important court cases have been in the eastern US.

40 posted on 12/20/2001 10:53:03 AM PST by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson