Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Movie Review—The Lord of the Rings
CatholicExchange.com ^ | 12/19/01 | Steven D. Greydanus

Posted on 12/19/2001 5:52:04 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
Excellent movie, just saw it. DO NOT take your young children. My wife took out my 5 yr old son and 7 yr old daughter after a short while (they went next door to Monsters inc). My 9 yr old stayed, but if I had it to do over, I'm not sure I would have taken him either.

The movie captures the reality of Tolkien's book quite well, but some small sacrifices had to be made to translate to theater. The evil things are very dark, very evil, very frightening.

Otherwise, I cannot recommend it highly enough!!!

1 posted on 12/19/2001 5:52:04 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Catholic_list; *Christian_list; *Abortion_list; *Pro_life; patent; notwithstanding; JMJ333...
I rarely go to movies these days. I NEVER see a movie at the theater more than once.

I will definitely see this movie again, maybe several times, while it is in the theaters.

I just read The Fellowship of the Ring again, and I then read it to my 9 year old son. We were both really looking forward to this film.

The evil things, as I said above, are quite frightening (PG-13 rating). This is not a film for children under ten (my mistake, Mikey is nine and it was just too violent.)

That said, I'm awestruck at how faithful to Tolkien's book this film was.

Go see it. It is a treat, especially if you are a Tolkien fan. Don't take young kids though.

2 posted on 12/19/2001 5:57:30 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
It was too long (3 hours) and probably a hit with the gay community. The men were effeminate and prettier than the girls.

great special effects but I'd hit the matinee. You come stumbling out thinking you would not sit through that again.

Starship Trooper was a lot better.

3 posted on 12/19/2001 5:59:49 PM PST by holman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
"The Fellowship Of The Ring": review by Darth Sidious
4 posted on 12/19/2001 6:00:51 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
And Tolkien was a deeply Christian man...the literati criticize the book and the film because it stands strongly behind the idea that right and wrong can be clearly defined...

And thus clearly fought for.

LOTR, the soon-to-be biggest film of all time!

5 posted on 12/19/2001 6:01:47 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: holman
Starship Trooper was a lot better.

Are you NUTS!!!??? "Starship Troopers" was a HORRIBLE movie. Not only that, it completely MISSED the spirit and theme of the Robert Heinlein novel.

6 posted on 12/19/2001 6:03:32 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: holman
“If someone dislikes it,” poet and literary critic W. H. Auden once declared of Tolkien’s epic saga, “I shall never trust their literary judgment about anything again.” I feel exactly the same way about

your comments here.

7 posted on 12/19/2001 6:07:19 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
Good find! Enjoyed reading this-type Bump.
8 posted on 12/19/2001 6:12:48 PM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Starship Trooper was a lot better. More bug gore (but not much more).
9 posted on 12/19/2001 6:20:25 PM PST by holman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
Probably too violent for kids and watching extended close-ups of the asexual protagonist gave me the creeps.

Unless, of course, the viewer is in to Tolkien self-absorption "gee will it follow the books exactly 'cause I have read them all a gazillion times". You can hear this type loudly talking the plot and laughing at some hidden dialogue meaning probably talked about ad nauseum in some obscure chat room dedicated to LOR aficionados. But, I could be a little hard on it.

10 posted on 12/19/2001 6:22:52 PM PST by holman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: holman
You're gay.
11 posted on 12/19/2001 6:28:39 PM PST by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: holman
It was too long (3 hours) and probably a hit with the gay community. The men were effeminate and prettier than the girls.

It was too long, it should have been tightened up. If you had no idea where the story was going you'd get lost, perhaps bored on the long road to the poorly foreshadowed "cliffhanger" ending.

I'm not sure about a 'hit with the gay community', certainly I felt the Frodo/Sam relationship had a homosexual flavour to it at the end but I dismissed that as Hobbit behavior and perhaps some Freeper-induced paranoia/oversensitivity to seeing gay anything whether it's there or not. The "Men" were not effeminate in any sense really, not that I noticed. Of course, Bloom, who looked disturbingly like "Doogie Houser", was appropriately "pretty" as the warrior elf.

great special effects but I'd hit the matinee. You come stumbling out thinking you would not sit through that again.

I felt that way but I've been having second thoughts as something were so well done, especially the acting and how seemless the CGI alterations were for the Hobbits, Dwarves and so on.

Starship Trooper was a lot better.

That's a funny (as in "ha, ha") movie with, oddly enough, Doogie Houser. But, admit it, the only reason you liked that better is instead of seeing Frodo's lone, seemingly accidental, nipple flash are the bare breasted women in the co-ed showers.

12 posted on 12/19/2001 6:30:51 PM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: holman
Why don't you head over to the "The Fellowship Of The Ring": review by Darth Sidious" thread and share your views with them?
13 posted on 12/19/2001 6:32:24 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: holman
extended close-ups of the asexual protagonist gave me the creeps

I expected this type of BS from certain sophomorish creeps here on FR. You do not disappoint. I was reflecting on Tolkien's presentation of non-Eros love, and the film's adaptation of it (which, again, is superb) and I literally thought there will be some small minded people, uncomfortable with a presentation of Agape or true love in the Christian, non-Eros sense, that will try to poke fun at this in the film. You make a fool only of yourself.

14 posted on 12/19/2001 6:37:17 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC; holman
Bump. I am looking forward to this one. The comparison to starship troopers? LOL. Starship was a B movie, modern style. Attack of the killer tomatoes with alien bugs. To say that movie was better either betrays an addiction to bug guts being splattered, or is damning with faint praise.
15 posted on 12/19/2001 6:46:50 PM PST by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patent
Make sure you also read the other review by FR's Darth Sidious linked above. This will probably become my favorite movie of all time. I'll be going again with just my wife this weekend. Its worth seeing...again...
16 posted on 12/19/2001 6:51:22 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Starship Trooper was a lot better.

Are you NUTS!!!???

Tsk, tsk. Tolkein fans should be better at identifying trolls than this.

17 posted on 12/19/2001 7:05:02 PM PST by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: holman
“If someone dislikes it,” poet and literary critic W. H. Auden once declared of Tolkien’s epic saga, “I shall never trust their literary judgment about anything again.”
18 posted on 12/19/2001 7:09:52 PM PST by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
I'm curious why you ever thought it was a good idea to take your young children to this movie in the first place? I'd been watching reviews for the past couple of weeks, and it was made very clear that this was not at all a movie for children. PG-13 was pushing it. My own experience seeing the movie confirmed this.

I'm not asking to put you on the defensive. I'm genuinely curious. In the theatre where I saw the movie there were others who brought children who looked as young as 7. I was leary of their judgement when I saw that, and my reservation was confirmed several times throughout the film (One little girl somewhere behind me took up an annoying nervous chatter with her parents that lasted virtually the entire film. Of course the parents never got a clue that she was frightened and ought to take her out of a movie not geared toward little girls.).

19 posted on 12/19/2001 7:11:00 PM PST by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Starship Troopers And have you ever read the book? It was published in the 50s. I can't see how it was ever published. Terrible book. The publisher must have gone out of business years ago for publishing junk like that.
20 posted on 12/19/2001 7:11:15 PM PST by Father Wu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson