Skip to comments.
Ex-topless dancer accused of Web-stalking ex-lover
Sacbee.com ^
| Published 12:05 a.m. PST Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2001
Posted on 12/19/2001 1:20:39 PM PST by Texaggie79
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:32:04 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
VENTURA, Calif. (AP) - A former Las Vegas topless dancer is charged with cyber-stalking for allegedly creating a Web site with photos of her ex-lover engaged in sadomasochism and then notifying his family.
Robin Kelly, 43, is charged with two felony counts of stalking, two counts of attempted witness intimidation and one count of attempted extortion. A preliminary hearing in Ventura County Superior Court is expected to conclude Wednesday, when the judge will rule whether she should stand trial.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: Texaggie79
I can understand destroying this woman legally for what she has done, but how are the photo's very damaging? For the cost of a few hours time, I could have convincing photos of ANYbody doing ANYthing. In todays technology, this is not too hard.
So this guy really shouldn't be suffering too hard.
Um, pardon that pun.
To: gjenkins
When dating strippers, never use your real name. It is only fair.You mean (shocked expression) her name really wasn't Breathless Bigbouncyfun?
To: phasma proeliator, poohbah
Alright, y'all asked for
it.
To: Lazamataz
Oh, Laz.........I forgot to tell you your cousin was in the biz......
To: Texaggie79
OMG........ewwwww....ewwwwwwwww......
To: Lazamataz
At least she's leaving ME alone now! lol
To: one_particular_harbour
I'm not quite sure what crime she committed. Setting up a website that exposes the truth about something shouldn't be illegal, and there doesn't seem to be much question that she was telling the truth.
There's no question that she was vengeful and sought to destroy this man, but if the truth hurts, maybe he'll quit letting strippers take his picture during sex acts.
27
posted on
12/19/2001 1:40:45 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Texaggie79
You bad!
To: Texaggie79; dubyaismypresident
Oh for shame! ROFLOL!
W, reply #23.
To: Texaggie79
After moving to Simi Valley, she allegedly set up an Internet site that featured photographs of their sexual trysts that included whips and bondage, photos of the man's car, home, license plate and driver's license and a map with directions to his Las Vegas home. This dude is an idiot. If you are having an affair with Candilicious from the local t*tty bar, DO NOT let her take pics....
To: Texaggie79
Ex-topless dancer accused of Web-stalking ex-lover The first picture that jumped into my mind when I read this headline was a scene of a woman putting on her blouse, the guy pulling up his pants and walking into a Halloween "House of Horrors" with her skulking behind.
To: Texaggie79
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned!!
32
posted on
12/19/2001 1:44:38 PM PST
by
rmvh
To: Texaggie79
33
posted on
12/19/2001 1:44:46 PM PST
by
dighton
To: Texaggie79
egginasock
To: Lazamataz
I was just about to ask if that double-use of "too hard" was innocent or Freudian until I scrolled down one line and saw it was you.
To: Texaggie79
Quit drooling over her 36 longs and come back to the thread.
To: Lazamataz
No, and her name wasn't Chandelier either. (True date story)
37
posted on
12/19/2001 1:47:35 PM PST
by
gjenkins
To: Texaggie79
No matter how much they keep asking me, this is why I don't date strippers. 1 posted by Texaggie79 Yeah, I went to our super Wal-Mart the other day and asked for an electric cart. when I brought it back, the clerk asked if I had left a cane there. I told him I carried it with me throughout the store ... to beat the women off when they assault me. He asked me if I'd ever had to use it. You know what the answer was, 'Not yet!' Do strippers like cannings, in your experience?
38
posted on
12/19/2001 1:48:46 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
To: Texaggie79
Cameras and sex are a no-no combination.
To: Bella_Bru
"Quit drooling over her 36 longs and come back to the thread."
eeeew! again!
40
posted on
12/19/2001 1:51:58 PM PST
by
gjenkins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson