Skip to comments.
FLORIDA FIRM FIRST TO SELL ID MICROCHIPS TO BE IMPLANTED UNDER SKIN...
latimes ^
| 19-12-2001
| DAVID STREITFELD
Posted on 12/19/2001 7:22:42 AM PST by sunkist2
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:48 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
By DAVID STREITFELD -- A Florida company is poised to become the first to sell microchips designed to be implanted into human beings, an achievement that opens the door to new systems of medical monitoring and ID screening.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biometrics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: Quix
To protect from emp you need a "faraday cage" it doesn't have to be thick at all. When I was in grad school we protected delicate equipment with a faraday cage made from copper screen (looked just like fly screen). We made a room inside a larger one with every square inch of floor, walls, ceiling and door covered, and then ran a wire from the cage to the water pipe. We didn't do anything elaborate around the door. There was a small gap where the mesh on the door didn't touch the mesh on the frame when the door closed, but we did run a wire from the door mesh to the rest of the mesh so that it would be at the same electrical potential. It apparently worked because the delicate measurments that were made were accepted for publication (of course the stuff may have worked just fine without the cage too)
To: Quix
I do not know for certain but I think an electric stun gun or cattle prod may well induce enough current to fry one of these chips. As to a Faraday cage that would protect just about any circuitry from EMP the thinknes does not matter per se. What matters is the completeness of the covering. If the covering is grounded it is even more efficient. Columbs inverse square law is what actually protects the circuitry as long as it is entirely enclosed. Plugging in to an external power source does of course defeat any such cage.
Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown
42
posted on
12/19/2001 9:04:35 AM PST
by
harpseal
To: Sabertooth
Thanks for the flag!
Tattoos are so 20th Century .
Ve must update our methods!
To: harpseal
All the more reason for that tinfoil hat and suit.
44
posted on
12/19/2001 9:11:11 AM PST
by
stuartcr
To: from occupied ga;harpseal
In reference to needing a metal cage to protect you from emp as you "wear your chip", is this the metal cage you are referring to?
45
posted on
12/19/2001 9:12:34 AM PST
by
bwteim
To: Quix
Basicaly EMI,RFI,EMP, are very simple phenomenon which are seen as a "black box art" in problem solving but are actually very simple. There are conducted and radiated types of nasties. The most common is conducted. Devices can create a hell when it comes to guidance, low wattage signals. Things like the chemical composition of carbon brushes in an electric motor, the length of electrical cords, the triac switching your waterbed heater on and off, etc... are good examples to conducted emissions. Imagine a glideslope signal on an aircraft carrier of 10 watts. Five miles out, that will be very minimal reception in your F-16. Imagine someone turns on a deck elevator motor which kills the signal when that F-16 is in heavy weather due to emmissions from the motor. That is why a motor for the military costs 100 times the commercial version.
First, an isolation transformer for your house is a must. Next, your grounds must be of equal length, and kept very short.Next, any device you connect to your clean power should be suppressed to MIL-461 regarding conductive and radiated crud. Your PC keyboard, your monitor and other components should be in metal enclosures, or made internally conductive with conductive spray coatings. The hot and neutral must have circuit breakers at the device, not the wall. Regarding towers, reception or transmission equipment should have disconnects in the cables. When you are not using it, the disconnects should be open. Switches alone cannot help you. Most devices are only turned on/off through the hot. It is the lightning strike/EMP that feeds in through the neutral/phone/and antennae that gets your stuff fried. The tower itself if grounded well, should be of no consequence. Ground Rods should be all copper, and as long as 20' in the soil if you are in a sandy area.
46
posted on
12/19/2001 9:16:08 AM PST
by
blackdog
Comment #47 Removed by Moderator
To: bwteim
LOL - Undoubtedly the cage that the government would like to protect us into.
To: cdwright
So true, cdwright. Also meant there are already many [sheeple] who will accept these technologies without thinking of ramifications - so it simply becomes a matter of marketing.
49
posted on
12/19/2001 9:22:46 AM PST
by
bwteim
To: Sabertooth
Thanks for the heads up!
Comment #51 Removed by Moderator
To: WDreamsGirl
ya you're right, however, I would never invest in a company that would control people!
Comment #53 Removed by Moderator
To: cdwright
During the Early 80's knowledge of this was leaked out..or stream controlled in the media to assess the publics acceptance. They decided to slowly "Educate " the public through TV programs and movies. Images of individuals plugging things into their bodies to access information..touching keypads..or contact points below skin surface. Numbers and tatoo's on foreheads and necks... you can probably think of at least ten sci-fi programs that have daily forewarded this since the 80's... so it is .."The molding of a Generation"..that Gen..will not rebell or cause political trouble....that Gen is still a decade away...when they hit there late 30's and mid 40's...ie..the are the midstream of society..and have social conscience...then it comes...unless America turns to Gods word...and fears.
To: cdwright
bttt for the blind pollyanas of the world.
To: Sabertooth
Oh let me tell you a story... we are part of an 'experiment' at work as we will be wearing tracking devices that will let a central computer know where we are in our building. It knows when we enter the building, when we leave, move to a new space, go upstairs, etc. Thankfully, it doesn't work in the bathroom.
56
posted on
12/19/2001 10:26:12 AM PST
by
rintense
Comment #57 Removed by Moderator
To: Sabertooth
It would be possible, if done correctly, to implant a chip thru a newborn's skull. They could do it before the child left the delivery room. Impossible for recipient to remove it short of serious brain surgery. After all, The Beast wouldn't want it to be removed, right? And Revelation does talk about getting the mark on the hand OR the forehead. Scary.
To: softengine
Hate to be a spoil sport to the whole "identify everyone" globalist agenda, but no one is implanting anything in me.....ever.
Me neither
59
posted on
12/19/2001 10:50:06 AM PST
by
Kaslin
To: sunkist2
so if i get one will it help me remember what i went into the next room for???
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson