This is a really nice piece. It's too bad the differences are not of principle, but of style. Mr. Home Land Security agency is more of a threat to our liberties than Clinton could have ever been.
This is a really nice piece. It's too bad the differences are not of principle, but of style. Mr. Home Land Security agency is more of a threat to our liberties than Clinton could have ever been. Most Americans wouldn't agree with your assessment that:
"Bush's principles are no different from Clinton's. The only difference is style."
"President Bush (whose attorney general just point-blank refused the liberals' demands to make illegal surveillance use of firearms registration information) is more of a threat to our liberties than Clinton could have ever been."