Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Admin Moderator; BenF; El Gato; veryconernedamerican; crystalk; Texaggie79
In a reply yesterday BenF and others made comments which I refuted. That reply seems to have vanished.

1. The settlements are in territory taken in 1967.
2. They are illegal.
3. Jerusalem must be shared.
4. The PLA must insist that the Arab League recognize Israel by doing so themselves in word and in deed.
5. There are as few moderates in the PLA as there are in the Likud. Israel has Peres and the PLA has Hanna.

That was not the exact response but it touches the major points. If the Admin Moderator has a problem with this one then there needs to be an explanation.

234 posted on 12/19/2001 3:04:15 PM PST by harrowup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: harrowup
1. The settlements are in territory taken in 1967.

Date doesn't matter. Possesion is 90% of the law.

They are illegal.

He who has the gold (or in this case, land) makes the laws.

Jerusalem must be shared.

Says who? I'm sorry but that is a Jewish city. And even when Barak tried to give up half of it, Arafat declined. So TOO BAD. The Palestines want nothing less than ALL Jerusalem.

The PLA must insist that the Arab League recognize Israel by doing so themselves in word and in deed.

Now you are just asking for miracles.


235 posted on 12/19/2001 3:18:02 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: harrowup
Jerusalem must be shared.

Paris must be shared.

237 posted on 12/19/2001 3:26:34 PM PST by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: harrowup
If the Admin Moderator has a problem with this one then there needs to be an explanation.

I can see you are making up your own set of rules. Keep it up. Sooner or later you will be banned. With your "blame the Jews" attitude, you won't be missed.

241 posted on 12/19/2001 5:58:12 PM PST by BenF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: harrowup;BenF; El Gato; veryconernedamerican; crystalk; Texaggie79
"To: Admin Moderator; BenF; El Gato; veryconernedamerican; crystalk; Texaggie79

In a reply yesterday BenF and others made comments which I refuted. That reply seems to have vanished.

That was not the exact response but it touches the major points. If the Admin Moderator has a problem with this one then there needs to be an explanation.

234 posted on 12/19/01 7:04 PM Eastern by harrowup

On 12/18 you had no posts removed. On 12/18 you did make this reply to BenF. Is that the one which was supposedly deleted? It never was.

332 posted on 12/21/2001 4:10:32 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson