Oh, yes. Every spot that Slobo wanted to incorporate into "Greater Serbia" just HAPPENED to be occupied by terrorists.
And then every Serb in Krajina just HAPPENED to be a terrorist when the Croats got rocking and rolling. And every Serb in Bosnia just HAPPENED to be a terrorist when the Muslims started hopping.
Sure were a LOT of "terrorists" on all sides...or the politicians on all sides LIED, and their citizens were either stupid enough to believe it without question, or they were evil enough to shoot their neighbors because the bossman said to. I really don't care what the excuse is from ANYONE.
Let's get some things straight:
- The KLA received support from al Qai'da, as did the more radical elements among the Bosniac Muslims.
- The Racak massacre was fake by the Albanians.
- The Sarajevo market was shelled by the Bosniac Muslims--according to Japanese observers' analysis to provoke a NATO intevention.
- The Serbs are Christians.
- The Albanians and Bosniacs are Muslims.
- Slobodan Milosevic was not a nice ruler, but the number of civilian dead per enemy combattant in his counterinsurgencies was outstripped by America at Waco, Ruby Ridge or the MOVE seige in Philadelphia in the days of Mayor Wilson Good.
We continue to make the Balkans safe for Islamist radicals, and our policy will come back to bite us. In case it has escaped you, gratitude to non-Muslims does not seem to be an Islamic virtue: our foreign policy has plainly been pro-Muslim everywhere except Palestine for decades, and upon reflection has been objectively pro-Muslim there too--only America restrains Likud-governed Israel from wiping out its enemies. bin Laden is the Islamic world's thanks for our troubles.
Perhaps the Serbs simply have a clearer understanding of our now common enemy, having dealt with them for centuries.