Skip to comments.
DU Discusses Libertarianism
Democratic Underground ^
Posted on 12/17/2001 12:32:10 PM PST by NC_Libertarian
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-230 next last
To: Dane
Huh? My politcal philosophy doesn't hinge on every moment to spout about how the fate of the republic hangs on the right to smoke dope(I will give you a hint of who they are, Lib-rtar-ans).Your political philosophy seems to be geared around attacking anyone who might have some point, large or small, that they agree with libertarians on. Then you try to smear them with your "doper" brush. It's wearing thin.
41
posted on
12/17/2001 3:26:45 PM PST
by
Dakmar
To: Dane
Sorry. I don't use illegal drugs; never have; never will.
To: AUgrad
You speak as if Harry Browne speaks for everyone with libertarian leanings. I assure you, he doesn't I see that you haven't been around FR too long. You weren't around here in election season 2000, when Harry was the Libertarian "god".
43
posted on
12/17/2001 3:27:37 PM PST
by
Dane
To: jackbob
No sarcasm intended, but how do you approach gun-control from a liberal perspective. Now, a radical left perspective -- see left-Anarchist singer Leslie Fish, for example -- I can see.
To: Dakmar
You may be right. Certainly most of the songwriters of that era (or this) would want it to mean what you see in it. I know nothing of Alvin Lee (writer?) either, but when I first heard it as a kid when it came out, it struck a chord in me. Maybe I misinterpreted and am giving him way too much credit, lol.
45
posted on
12/17/2001 3:28:33 PM PST
by
fnord
To: Always Right
I am sure we can show you more intolerance in the future. Wouldn't count. You had to be prompted. 8>)
To: VA Advogado
When they're wishing harm to my kids, for my political beliefs, they're not my "brothers in arms."
To: Timesink
DING DING DING! You, my friend, win a cigar. This is the Quote of the Week. Thanks. But the week is young and I may yet be trumped.
To: Dakmar
Perhaps you've heard the old saw that "Capitalism distributes wealth unequally but Socialism distributes poverty equally"
To: Virginia-American
Leftists are much more prone to use ad hominen and other name-calling, and the use of 'magic words' that are supposed to stop all argument (racist, McCarthyite, gun lobby, you know the drill) . Yes, I agree completely. They are much dirtier fighters. They also tend to hide, disguise, and quite often out right lie, far more than conservatives do. They have the same view of conservatives. But I can say, having traversed both camps, they are far more deceitful.
I've criticized Reagan policies to conservatives but I've never been called a 'Reagan-hater'; but it's impossible to discuss any Cl*nt*n scandal with a leftie without being called a Cl*nt*n-hater.
On this one, I don't agree. I don't ever remember meeting a Clinton supporter who was not ready on a pin drop to criticize the heck out of him. They just were not about to do it as a part of a any conservative agenda (no matter how small - even in little 3 person office chit chat).
One note though is worth making here. They are always unable to stay on subject. If talking about Clintons faults, they will always add a Republicans fault to the conversation.
50
posted on
12/17/2001 3:33:05 PM PST
by
jackbob
To: VA Advogado
I keep hearing about all the l*b*r*ls who want to end the drug war, but all I'm aware of is a few D*m*cr*ts (not x42, not the Gov of CA, both of whom tried to stop the medipot initiative) who kinda go along with medical marijuana. Are there really any lefties who want to fire all the drug warriors, not spend all that money, not have an excuse for jailing minorities, etc, or have they really changed since W*ls*n's and FDR's time?
To: Virginia-American
My own experience is more akin to Celtjew Libertarian's that jackbob's. Leftists are much more prone to use ad hominen and other name-calling, and the use of 'magic words' that are supposed to stop all argument (racist, McCarthyite, gun lobby, you know the drill). Funny thing is that I've ended up in some discussions with leftists where they started flaming me (or others) with some of the most anti-Gay language I've heard. This isn't common, but it is frequent enough to be very interesting.
To: steve-b
("The poor have to use old replicators that can take an entire minute to make dinner, and many of them can only afford to take off-planet vacations once a year....")ROTFL!!!
That's almost fitting for the old (now defunct) NT zoo. Amusing clowns, aren't they -- DUers that is.
53
posted on
12/17/2001 3:34:17 PM PST
by
Zon
To: Dane
I see that you haven't been around FR too long. You weren't around here in election season 2000, when Harry was the Libertarian "god". For the record, I voted for Bush.
To: steve-b
It's a nice thought, but still the stuff of science fiction. I guess I shouldn't ever say 'never' when I mean "in the forseeable future". Also, megawealthy also means powerful (to me, anyway, in current context), not just blessed with material possesions.
Thank you for envisioning a happy outcome for all of humanity, though, I hope you are proven correct.
55
posted on
12/17/2001 3:35:01 PM PST
by
Dakmar
To: Dane
Good grief --- Does your insane anti-libertarian babble have no end?
Harry Browne has never been a 'god' here or anywhere.
[except your sick & fevered brain]
56
posted on
12/17/2001 3:35:13 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: VA Advogado
Libertarians are liberals who don't have the balls to admit it. I admit to being a classical liberal, but I'd probably have to explain that to you. Hint: it's not the same as 'leftist' or 'statist'.
57
posted on
12/17/2001 3:35:46 PM PST
by
tdadams
To: Zon
"I don't know whether he has balls or is just ignorant."
He is an avatar keyboard warrior. God bless his angry ol' heart. Thigh highs are the only boots he probably wears ... or waders.
58
posted on
12/17/2001 3:37:06 PM PST
by
gjenkins
To: tdadams
"Liberal" got hijacked and I've never been sure whether to blame the left or George H.W. Bush's 1988 campaign.
To: muir_redwoods
Perhaps you've heard the old saw that "Capitalism distributes wealth unequally but Socialism distributes poverty equally"I've never heard it put exactly that way, but I believe it is 100% correct. Do you know who said that originally?
60
posted on
12/17/2001 3:38:38 PM PST
by
Dakmar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-230 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson