Up to post 95? What are you talking about PA? I was responding to your latest post where you claim that I have not debated the issue. I have provided you with evidence that I have in fact addressed the issue, and you reply by launching yet further *PERSONAL ATTACKS* towards me. The fact that you chose to confine yourself to post 95 is your issue, and has nothing to do with your accusation other than provide conditions that you think will prove you right. To claim I haven't made a comment on addressing the article, then intentionally ignore post #202 is quire ingenious and very telling of your method of "debate".
Look, if you sincerely don't wish to look at the fact that I have addressed your accusations, that's fine. Those lurkers left reading this in fact know that I have answered your crude accusations and name calling with evidence. You can claim one thing all you want PA, but when I show you evidence to the contrary, where does it benefit you to continue this name calling? Does it make you feel important, somehow, to do these kinds of thing? Do you enjoy belittling innocent people, does it make you happy? I really am at a loss as to how to continue this conversation if you ignore everything I post contrary to your accusations and you continue to call names.