Posted on 12/17/2001 6:01:47 AM PST by veronica
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:48 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Hey, don't you know the rules here on FR? veronica is the official FR anti-Semite detector and labeler. There is no appeal from her judgements, they are final. If you dare protest, the entire Israel-over-America promotion crowd will swoop in and peck your eyes out.
Funny! I'm waiting for all these "words have no meaning" folks to poke at a Democrat or Clinton in a future post for improper or incorrect use of the language. They rail when Clinton mouths the Elastic-Depends-On-How-You-Define-The-Word-Is-Lie-Of-The-Day, but for the life of me, I do not know why, given their attitude on this.
All I suggested was that *THE MEDIA* use words correctly. I wasn't aware that this was an offensive request.
I've always heard that when you find yourself in a hole, the first thing you want to do is stop digging. Apparently you heard something different.
Look, Einstein -- I used your dictionary to blow holes in your claimed definition -- it says precisely what you insist is the wrong definition.
So let me get this straight -- I'm out of line, I'm abusing the language, because I use the standard definition, which is even confirmed by the reference you supplied?
Get back under your bridge, troll!
It would be wonderfull if all the religous leaders, the political leaders, the intelengensia simply got together and desided to let the world on one big secret! That is all the three religeons are just the invention of some desert people. The concepts were good to establish civility. However, in the 21st century, we are way past this BS! I would love for the pope, the sheikh of Azhar, the chief rabi, to just have a joint conference were they let the rest of the us on that long kept secret. God is a concept that should live in our hearts. It is not the scriptures. The scriptures were written by desert people that favors women. The scriptures were not given to us by God, they were writen by men, to establish better conduct between people.
By defintion, each religeon MUST teach its people that they are right and the rest are wrong. That is important in order to keep market share, and even capture market share from adverseries. the problem in this picture, is people get so wraped up in their zealot for their perceived right, and the rewards in heaven, that they behave irrationally.
It is about time that people on this planet began to realize how stupid is all that hate. I am not saying the hate is coming from the Moslem side alone, there is plenty of hate coming from the Jewish side too. The Christians are not too dangerous at this point, because they have been defanged for many years.
Jews who don't believe in God, yet they want to kill themselves in defense of a worthless desert; simply because "GOD" promised them that desert. Moslems, who want to kill every body or convert the whole world into Islam; a barbaric religeon, to the extent of dying in the process and getting 72 vigins! What is it with this virgin thing! The entire barbaric history of the three religeons deals with the VIRGIN stories. Can some body bring the news to these stupid people that an experienced hore is much better than a virgin!
I am so tired of this subject, I will shut up, for now
Praise God.
All you have done is to split the hair down the middle while ignoring the subject at hand, and by a trick of verbal legerdemain make a horse chestnut into a chestnut horse.
I prefer to use the good old fashioned term Jew hater.
Now granted, anti-semite is not a trade name. But is is an incorrect usage of the word semite, period.
You win. Words are inconsequential. Its all how we define them at the moment, subject to change at any time, for any reason. You win.
You go getten der judenposterheimeren!
Not according to the dictionary... But if you say its so, then it must be. Tell me, does antipasto means to be against food since pasto means "food" (from Latin)?
You're right, how foolish of me to state in the open that those in the media should use words correctly. The next thing you know, I'll be expecting Congress and the Supreme Court to follow the wording of the Constitution, under the evidently false notion that words have meaning.It is no wonder the Democrats and Socialists are able to subvert this nation so easily. Its not that words are used incorrectly, but that so many people get upset when you request that those in official publications use words correctly.
You know, I'd say something like, "Put down the shovel, and climb out with your hands up," but you're clearly beyond redemption.
Pick me up some eggrolls when you hit China, OK?
Exactly how do you define "correctly," Your Majesty?
I mean, hell, I used your dictionary to provide the definition that you continue to insist is wrong!
"I'm sorry that this offends you."
Huh? Is "that this" some new kind of "correct"?
At some point you've got to snap out of this, right?
PS: is a "lumberjack" someone who "lumbers" around doing "jack"? Just trying to deconstruct using the same ruleset you insist on applying to "antisemite", sorry if that (this?) offends you.
Exactly. Why bother going by the definition from the dictionary when you can make up your own meaning of the word antisemite? Good stuff, lumberdrek.
Actually, according to one of the two possible definitions lumberjack could mean "A short, warm outer jacket. Also called lumber jacket".
What gets me is how they seem to think they're so damn subtle -- instead of as blaringly obvious as they are.
Ever see The Blues Brothers? Remember that scene where the car is falling to oblivion, and one character says to the other, "I've always loved you"? That's what these brownshirt tagteams remind me of, LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.