Homosexuals obsess over homosexuality. Their peculiar perversion is the focus of their existence, their core definition as human beings. Desperate to compel public acceptance of their perversions, they spend huge sums and enormous amounts of time championing their sick agenda in the public square.
Understandly, gay activists' exertions in the public square tend to generate vigrous resistence from other citizens who haven't lost the ability to discern sexual perversions and who resent the gaystapo's blitzkrieg attempts to compel the rest of society to bow down and pronounce a death-dealing and disease-ridden lifestyle "good" and "wholesome."
Then you try to turn this reaction against the protesters by suggesting that their resistence must be due to their "obsessing over homosexuality."
Suppose you threw a party and some naturalist, vegan, Gaia-worshipping freak dropped a cow flop in the punchbowl and told you it would add flavor and disease-fighting factors to the mix. Would you believe her? Would you drink and be happy? If you refused and she accused you of being a coprophobe, would you be shamed into drinking it?
Or would you refuse and stand accused of being "obsessed" with the cow flop?
But the gaystapo is pushing even harder. They want government to require a cowflop to be be added to public fountains and punchbowls through the land and to require children to be indoctrinated or pressured into accepting it as normal and health-promoting.