Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: liberallarry
When it is dominant - although it begins with the idea of meritocracy - it usually slides into the mistaken identification of wealth as proof of merit and abandons the idea of noblesse oblige - which is necessary in any decent society - in favor of unfettered greed

Explain this to me! I think Gen-X'ers are also fed up with psychobabble! I know I am!

29 posted on 12/16/2001 8:10:52 AM PST by gr8eman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: gr8eman
One favored group is replaced by another. The son-in-law replaces the black man. And so on. There's a reason why the Founders sought to prevent the re-establishment of a society of rentiers.

The most perfect meritocratic element of our society is professional sports. In that world a few superstars are showered with enormous wealth, a larger group make a decent living, and the remaining athletes of the world have to find some other way to survive. Without some form of redistribution - noblesse oblige or taxation or you name it - you'll get that kind of distribution over much of society.

35 posted on 12/16/2001 9:01:14 AM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson