[Skywalk]

It's not tyrranical, it's simply self-defense. I've long held that one need not be in imminent danger before taking up arms. Should a slave simply submit to his master, or else be branded as "no different than a slavemaster?"

If a person is not harming anyone else, and exercises his rights, he should be left alone. If someone breaks in my house at the order and support of others, his life, AND the lives of his controllers are forfeit.

[Roscoe]

It's not tyrranical, it's simply self-defense.

Libertarianism's capacity for sophistry is limitless.