Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MileHi
Gee thats funny. Another Denver lawyer filed suit based on the same law being unconstitutional and the court rejected it because he did not have standing. He had to ammend the complaint to prove he was somehow injured by the statute.

But he didn't get himself arrested did he? My point exactly. You don't have to be arrested to have standing to challenge a law. Dunce.

442 posted on 12/17/2001 10:51:56 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]


To: VA Advogado
But he didn't get himself arrested did he? My point exactly. You don't have to be arrested to have standing to challenge a law. Dunce.

He is also in appeal because the lower court felt he hadn't been damaged. They avoided the constitutional aspect. Because it is not a criminal matter, there was no jury, only a liberal judge. Moron.

457 posted on 12/17/2001 5:55:02 PM PST by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson