Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ThJ1800
Gee whiz, this guy is printed in the NY Times -- isn't he supposed to be smart or something?

The pathetic liberals are really grasping, trying to interpret support for the military, a conservative cause, with support for the bureaucracy. These mfers are talking to themselves in an echo chamber.

I have a suspicion that we will see another grand sweep of liberals from congress in 2002, and they do not see the train a-coming. The arrogance of liberals in these circumstances and their misreading of the national mood reminds me of the revulsion to hillary klinton previous to 94. It's time to teach these punks another lesson.

7 posted on 12/13/2001 5:26:16 PM PST by Monti Cello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Monti Cello
Are you smoking something??? While I don't expect the Dems to have a substantial gain, nor will they have a substantial loss, now or in the future. There's a great deal of satisfaction with "the Gummint" out there--as long as the question seems to include GWB's trouncing of the Taliban and excellent (to date) progress in Afg'nstn. HOWEVER, if the question is phrased: "Do you think that you're getting your money's worth--over 1/3 of your income---from the Gummint??" the answer may not be quite so positive.
10 posted on 12/13/2001 7:11:56 PM PST by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson