[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]

So, you think voting, in effect, "none of the above" makes one's opinion not worth considering?

No, I think that the inability to see a difference between Bush and Clinton indicates a lack of information or lack of the ability to reason clearly or a lack of honesty. If some one is uninformed or irrational or dishonest, it makes no sense to consider their opinion.

[Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek]

So, you think voting, in effect, "none of the above" makes one's opinion not worth considering?

No, I think that the inability to see a difference between Bush and Clinton indicates a lack of information or lack of the ability to reason clearly or a lack of honesty. If some one is uninformed or irrational or dishonest, it makes no sense to consider their opinion.

Which election were you thinking of? I'm fairly sure Clinton was not a candidate for US President in the 2000 election. As for the candidates in 2000, there were many differences between them, some obvious, some not. One thing was the same for all of them, however. None of them merited my vote.

Our primaries this week were mostly favorable to the candidates I found suitable for a vote. The rest got chosen without my endorsement. For some reason this approach to participating in an election bugs you. I wonder why.